Clicky

Casio EX-Z400 vs Samsung NX300

Portability
95
Imaging
34
Features
25
Overall
30
Casio Exilim EX-Z400 front
 
Samsung NX300 front
Portability
86
Imaging
61
Features
73
Overall
65

Casio EX-Z400 vs Samsung NX300 Key Specs

Casio EX-Z400
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-112mm (F2.6-7.0) lens
  • 130g - 95 x 60 x 23mm
  • Released January 2009
Samsung NX300
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3.3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 1/6000s Max Shutter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Samsung NX Mount
  • 331g - 122 x 64 x 41mm
  • Announced November 2013
  • Replaced the Samsung NX210
  • Replacement is Samsung NX500
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Casio EX-Z400 vs Samsung NX300 Overview

On this page, we will be analyzing the Casio EX-Z400 vs Samsung NX300, one is a Ultracompact and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Casio and Samsung. There exists a crucial gap among the resolutions of the EX-Z400 (12MP) and NX300 (20MP) and the EX-Z400 (1/2.3") and NX300 (APS-C) provide totally different sensor sizes.

Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera

The EX-Z400 was introduced 5 years before the NX300 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z400 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung NX300 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before we go right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the EX-Z400 scores against the NX300 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photography Glossary

        

Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z400 over the Samsung NX300

 EX-Z400 NX300 

Reasons to pick Samsung NX300 over the Casio EX-Z400

 NX300 EX-Z400 
AnnouncedNovember 2013January 2009More modern by 59 months
Manual focus More precise focus
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen dimensions3.3"3"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution768k230kSharper screen (+538k dot)
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Casio EX-Z400 and Samsung NX300

 EX-Z400 NX300 
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen

Casio EX-Z400 vs Samsung NX300 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is intending to carry around your camera regularly, you should factor its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z400 has got outside measurements of 95mm x 60mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 130 grams (0.29 lbs) and the Samsung NX300 has sizing of 122mm x 64mm x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") and a weight of 331 grams (0.73 lbs).

Contrast the Casio EX-Z400 vs Samsung NX300 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-Z400 and the NX300.

Casio EX-Z400 vs Samsung NX300 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z400 and NX300 is 95 and 86 respectively.

Casio EX-Z400 vs Samsung NX300 top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-Z400 vs Samsung NX300 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it's difficult to visualise the gap in sensor sizes purely by researching technical specs. The image underneath might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z400 and NX300.

As you can tell, the 2 cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The EX-Z400 with its smaller sensor will make achieving shallower DOF more difficult and the Samsung NX300 will render extra detail using its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z400 will be behind in sensor technology.

Casio EX-Z400 vs Samsung NX300 sensor size comparison

Casio EX-Z400 vs Samsung NX300 Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-Z400 vs Samsung NX300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-Z400 Portrait photography details
Samsung NX300 Portrait photography details
20
lack of manual focus
lack of manual exposure
no external flash support
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
76
you can focus manually
good megapixels (20 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
has face detect focus
exports RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Casio EX-Z400 Street photography factors
Samsung NX300 Street photography factors
56
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen is fixed
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
80
screen tilts
good sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW files
includes focus via touch
above average high ISO (25,600)
does not have image stabilization
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Casio EX-Z400
Sports photography with Samsung NX300
25
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
low max shutter speed (1/1,000 seconds)
no shutter priority
megapixel count low (12MP)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
72
high shutter speed (1/6,000s)
good megapixels (20MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
has tracking focus
has phase detect auto focus
does not have image stabilization
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Casio EX-Z400
Travel photography with Samsung NX300
58
flash built-in
fairly wide (28mm)
does not have Time Lapse function
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.6)
66
includes focus via touch
good megapixels (20MP)
missing Time Lapse mode
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-Z400 Landscape photography info
Samsung NX300 Landscape photography info
36
fairly wide (28mm)
good sized screen (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.6)
lack of manual exposure
megapixel count low (12MP)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
does not have Time Lapse function
71
you can focus manually
switch lenses (Samsung NX mount)
nice screen size (3.3 inch)
good megapixels (20MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
above average high ISO (25,600)
exports RAW files
does not have image stabilization
missing Time Lapse mode
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-Z400 as a Vlogging camera
Samsung NX300 as a Vlogging camera
29
fairly wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.6)
display isn't selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have mic support
33
has touchscreen
has face detect focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
does not have image stabilization
missing mic socket
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Casio EX-Z400 vs Samsung NX300 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-Z400 and Samsung NX300
 Casio Exilim EX-Z400Samsung NX300
General Information
Brand Name Casio Samsung
Model Casio Exilim EX-Z400 Samsung NX300
Category Ultracompact Entry-Level Mirrorless
Released 2009-01-08 2013-11-24
Physical type Ultracompact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - DRIMe IV
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 20 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4000 x 3000 5472 x 3648
Highest native ISO 1600 25600
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Number of focus points - 247
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens Samsung NX
Lens focal range 28-112mm (4.0x) -
Largest aperture f/2.6-7.0 -
Total lenses - 32
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1.5
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Tilting
Display diagonal 3" 3.3"
Display resolution 230k dots 768k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Display technology - Active Matrix OLED screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 1/2 seconds 30 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/1000 seconds 1/6000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate - 9.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range - no built-in flash
Flash modes - Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Highest flash synchronize - 1/180 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) 1920 x 1080, 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video data format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB none USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None Optional
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 130 grams (0.29 lbs) 331 grams (0.73 lbs)
Physical dimensions 95 x 60 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") 122 x 64 x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 76
DXO Color Depth score not tested 23.6
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 12.7
DXO Low light score not tested 942
Other
Battery life - 330 pictures
Battery type - Battery Pack
Battery model NP-40 BP1130
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) Yes (2 sec to 30 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots 1 1
Cost at launch $0 $750