Casio EX-Z400 vs Samsung SL620
95 Imaging
34 Features
25 Overall
30
![Casio Exilim EX-Z400 front Casio Exilim EX-Z400 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/w300/fronton/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z400-ek-fs.jpg)
![Samsung SL620 front Samsung SL620 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Samsung-SL620/Samsung-SL620-front.jpg)
94 Imaging
35 Features
13 Overall
26
Casio EX-Z400 vs Samsung SL620 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.6-7.0) lens
- 130g - 95 x 60 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-175mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Released February 2009
- Other Name is PL65
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-Z400 vs Samsung SL620 Overview
Here is a comprehensive assessment of the Casio EX-Z400 versus Samsung SL620, both Ultracompact cameras by companies Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-Z400 (12MP) and the SL620 (12MP) is relatively close and both cameras provide the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
The EX-Z400 was manufactured at a similar time to the SL620 so they are both of a similar generation. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before delving right into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the EX-Z400 grades versus the SL620 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-Z400 vs Samsung SL620 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z400 and Samsung SL620. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z400 Gallery and Samsung SL620 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z400 over the Samsung SL620
EX-Z400 | SL620 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL620 over the Casio EX-Z400
SL620 | EX-Z400 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-Z400 and Samsung SL620
EX-Z400 | SL620 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2009 | ![]() | February 2009 | Same generation |
Manual focus | ![]() | No manual focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | The same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-Z400 vs Samsung SL620 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry your camera, you will want to factor in its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z400 enjoys exterior measurements of 95mm x 60mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 130 grams (0.29 lbs) and the Samsung SL620 has sizing of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-Z400 versus Samsung SL620 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are using during that time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-Z400 versus the SL620.
![Casio EX-Z400 vs Samsung SL620 size comparison Casio EX-Z400 vs Samsung SL620 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z400-vs-Samsung-SL620-size-comparison.jpg)
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z400 and SL620 is 95 and 94 respectively.
![Casio EX-Z400 vs Samsung SL620 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-Z400 vs Samsung SL620 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z400-vs-Samsung-SL620-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Casio EX-Z400 vs Samsung SL620 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be hard to imagine the contrast in sensor sizing only by researching specs. The graphic underneath will give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z400 and SL620.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the same megapixels so you should expect comparable quality of files however you need to factor the production date of the cameras into account.
![Casio EX-Z400 vs Samsung SL620 sensor size comparison Casio EX-Z400 vs Samsung SL620 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z400-vs-Samsung-SL620-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Casio EX-Z400 vs Samsung SL620 Screen and ViewFinder
![Casio EX-Z400 vs Samsung SL620 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-Z400 vs Samsung SL620 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z400-vs-Samsung-SL620-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-Z400 vs Samsung SL620 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z400 | Samsung SL620 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z400 | Samsung SL620 |
Also referred to as | - | PL65 |
Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2009-01-08 | 2009-02-17 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 35-175mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.6-7.0 | f/2.8-5.7 |
Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 2.7" |
Display resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1/2 seconds | 8 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 4.60 m |
Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 130g (0.29 lb) | 168g (0.37 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 95 x 60 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-40 | - |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail price | $0 | $200 |