Casio EX-Z400 vs Samsung TL225
95 Imaging
34 Features
25 Overall
30
94 Imaging
35 Features
33 Overall
34
Casio EX-Z400 vs Samsung TL225 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.6-7.0) lens
- 130g - 95 x 60 x 23mm
- Launched January 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-124mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 187g - 100 x 60 x 19mm
- Introduced August 2009
- Also Known as ST550
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-Z400 vs Samsung TL225 Overview
Its time to look more in depth at the Casio EX-Z400 vs Samsung TL225, both Ultracompact cameras by rivals Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-Z400 (12MP) and the TL225 (12MP) is relatively close and both cameras provide the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-Z400 was released 7 months prior to the TL225 which means that they are both of a similar age. The two cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before getting right into a full comparison, here is a short view of how the EX-Z400 matches up versus the TL225 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-Z400 vs Samsung TL225 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z400 & Samsung TL225. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z400 Gallery & Samsung TL225 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z400 over the Samsung TL225
| EX-Z400 | TL225 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung TL225 over the Casio EX-Z400
| TL225 | EX-Z400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | August 2009 |  | January 2009 | Fresher by 7 months |
| Screen size | 3.5" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 1152k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+922k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z400 and Samsung TL225
| EX-Z400 | TL225 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen |
Casio EX-Z400 vs Samsung TL225 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry your camera often, you'll have to take into account its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z400 offers outside dimensions of 95mm x 60mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 130 grams (0.29 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL225 has sizing of 100mm x 60mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") and a weight of 187 grams (0.41 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-Z400 vs Samsung TL225 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are working with at that moment. The following is a front view sizing comparison of the EX-Z400 against the TL225.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z400 and TL225 is 95 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-Z400 vs Samsung TL225 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's difficult to visualise the gap in sensor sizing just by viewing specifications. The graphic underneath will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z400 and TL225.
To sum up, each of these cameras feature the identical sensor size and the identical megapixels therefore you can expect comparable quality of photos though you may want to factor the launch date of the cameras into account. The older EX-Z400 will be behind in sensor tech.
Casio EX-Z400 vs Samsung TL225 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-Z400 vs Samsung TL225 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z400 | Samsung TL225 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z400 | Samsung TL225 |
| Also referred to as | - | ST550 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2009-01-08 | 2009-08-13 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 27-124mm (4.6x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.6-7.0 | f/3.5-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3.5 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 1,152 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1/2s | 8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1000s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.40 m |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 130 grams (0.29 lbs) | 187 grams (0.41 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 60 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 100 x 60 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-40 | SLB-07A |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $0 | $488 |