Casio EX-Z400 vs Samsung TL350
95 Imaging
34 Features
25 Overall
30


94 Imaging
33 Features
47 Overall
38
Casio EX-Z400 vs Samsung TL350 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.6-7.0) lens
- 130g - 95 x 60 x 23mm
- Launched January 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.4-5.8) lens
- 195g - 100 x 59 x 22mm
- Launched February 2010
- Alternative Name is WB2000

Casio EX-Z400 vs Samsung TL350 Overview
Lets examine more closely at the Casio EX-Z400 vs Samsung TL350, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-Z400 (12MP) and the TL350 (10MP) is relatively well matched and they enjoy the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").

The EX-Z400 was announced 13 months before the TL350 which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-Z400 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung TL350 being a Compact camera.
Before going straight into a complete comparison, below is a concise overview of how the EX-Z400 scores vs the TL350 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Casio EX-Z400 vs Samsung TL350 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z400 & Samsung TL350. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z400 Gallery & Samsung TL350 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z400 over the Samsung TL350
EX-Z400 | TL350 |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung TL350 over the Casio EX-Z400
TL350 | EX-Z400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2010 | ![]() | January 2009 | Fresher by 13 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z400 and Samsung TL350
EX-Z400 | TL350 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-Z400 vs Samsung TL350 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry your camera, you are going to need to factor its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z400 provides physical dimensions of 95mm x 60mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 130 grams (0.29 lbs) and the Samsung TL350 has sizing of 100mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 195 grams (0.43 lbs).
See the Casio EX-Z400 vs Samsung TL350 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are employing at that moment. Following is the front view scale comparison of the EX-Z400 and the TL350.

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z400 and TL350 is 95 and 94 respectively.

Casio EX-Z400 vs Samsung TL350 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its difficult to imagine the difference between sensor sizing merely by looking at specs. The graphic below should provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z400 and TL350.
All in all, the 2 cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different MP. You can count on the Casio EX-Z400 to give you greater detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs much more aggressively. The older EX-Z400 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.

Casio EX-Z400 vs Samsung TL350 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-Z400 vs Samsung TL350 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z400 | Samsung TL350 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z400 | Samsung TL350 |
Other name | - | WB2000 |
Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2009-01-08 | 2010-02-20 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.6-7.0 | f/2.4-5.8 |
Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 1/2s | 16s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 5.20 m |
Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 608 x 342 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps), 138 x 78 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 130g (0.29 lbs) | 195g (0.43 lbs) |
Dimensions | 95 x 60 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 100 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-40 | SLB-11A |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC, internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $0 | $400 |