Clicky

Casio EX-Z400 vs Samsung WB150F

Portability
95
Imaging
34
Features
25
Overall
30
Casio Exilim EX-Z400 front
 
Samsung WB150F front
Portability
93
Imaging
37
Features
42
Overall
39

Casio EX-Z400 vs Samsung WB150F Key Specs

Casio EX-Z400
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-112mm (F2.6-7.0) lens
  • 130g - 95 x 60 x 23mm
  • Revealed January 2009
Samsung WB150F
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
  • 188g - 107 x 61 x 23mm
  • Announced January 2012
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Casio EX-Z400 vs Samsung WB150F Overview

Following is a extensive overview of the Casio EX-Z400 and Samsung WB150F, one is a Ultracompact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-Z400 (12MP) and the WB150F (14MP) is relatively close and they possess the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The EX-Z400 was launched 4 years before the WB150F which is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-Z400 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB150F being a Compact camera.

Before going straight into a in depth comparison, below is a quick overview of how the EX-Z400 scores vs the WB150F with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z400 over the Samsung WB150F

 EX-Z400 WB150F 

Reasons to pick Samsung WB150F over the Casio EX-Z400

 WB150F EX-Z400 
AnnouncedJanuary 2012January 2009More modern by 36 months
Manually focus Dial accurate focusing
Screen resolution460k230kClearer screen (+230k dot)

Common features in the Casio EX-Z400 and Samsung WB150F

 EX-Z400 WB150F 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen dimensions
Selfie screen Neither comes with selfie screen
Touch screen Neither comes with Touch screen

Casio EX-Z400 vs Samsung WB150F Physical Comparison

For anybody who is going to carry around your camera often, you will want to consider its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-Z400 comes with physical dimensions of 95mm x 60mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 130 grams (0.29 lbs) while the Samsung WB150F has measurements of 107mm x 61mm x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 188 grams (0.41 lbs).

Contrast the Casio EX-Z400 and Samsung WB150F in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising at that moment. The following is the front view sizing comparison of the EX-Z400 compared to the WB150F.

Casio EX-Z400 vs Samsung WB150F size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z400 and WB150F is 95 and 93 respectively.

Casio EX-Z400 vs Samsung WB150F top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-Z400 vs Samsung WB150F Sensor Comparison

Normally, its hard to imagine the contrast in sensor sizes purely by viewing specifications. The image below will help give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z400 and WB150F.

Plainly, both of those cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different MP. You should count on the Samsung WB150F to provide you with extra detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots a little more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z400 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.

Casio EX-Z400 vs Samsung WB150F sensor size comparison

Casio EX-Z400 vs Samsung WB150F Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-Z400 vs Samsung WB150F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-Z400 Portrait photography info
Samsung WB150F Portrait photography info
20
focusing manually not possible
no manual mode
can't use external flash
low megapixels (12MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
42
has manual focus
decent megapixels (14MP)
includes face detection focusing
no external flash support
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Casio EX-Z400 Street photography info
Samsung WB150F Street photography info
56
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
62
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition in class (188 grams)
screen does not articulate
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Casio EX-Z400
Sports photography with Samsung WB150F
25
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
low maximum shutter speed (1/1,000 seconds)
lack of shutter priority mode
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
51
long zoom range (24-432mm 18.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (14MP)
includes tracking autofocus
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Casio EX-Z400
Travel photography with Samsung WB150F
58
built-in flash
relatively wide (28mm)
lack of Time Lapse function
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.6)
69
lighter than competition in class (188g)
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
really wide (24mm)
great zoom (432mm)
lack of Time Lapse recording
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-Z400 as a Landscape photography camera
Samsung WB150F as a Landscape photography camera
36
relatively wide (28mm)
good sized screen (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.6)
no manual mode
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
lack of Time Lapse function
49
has manual focus
really wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (14MP)
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
lack of Time Lapse recording
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-Z400 Vlogging details
Samsung WB150F Vlogging details
29
relatively wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.6)
display isn't selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of external mic jack
32
really wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detection focusing
lighter than competition in class (188 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
low quality video (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of external mic port
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Casio EX-Z400 vs Samsung WB150F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-Z400 and Samsung WB150F
 Casio Exilim EX-Z400Samsung WB150F
General Information
Manufacturer Casio Samsung
Model Casio Exilim EX-Z400 Samsung WB150F
Category Ultracompact Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2009-01-08 2012-01-09
Body design Ultracompact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 14MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4000 x 3000 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 1600 3200
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-112mm (4.0x) 24-432mm (18.0x)
Maximal aperture f/2.6-7.0 f/3.2-5.8
Macro focus range - 5cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Screen technology - TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 1/2 seconds 16 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/1000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed - 10.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range - 3.50 m
Flash modes - Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video data format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB none USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 130 grams (0.29 lbs) 188 grams (0.41 lbs)
Dimensions 95 x 60 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") 107 x 61 x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model NP-40 SLB-10A
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) Yes
Time lapse recording
Storage media SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots 1 1
Launch cost $0 $230