Casio EX-Z400 vs Samsung WB50F
95 Imaging
34 Features
25 Overall
30
92 Imaging
40 Features
36 Overall
38
Casio EX-Z400 vs Samsung WB50F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.6-7.0) lens
- 130g - 95 x 60 x 23mm
- Released January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 207g - 101 x 68 x 27mm
- Announced January 2014
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-Z400 vs Samsung WB50F Overview
Here, we will be matching up the Casio EX-Z400 vs Samsung WB50F, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. There is a noticeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the EX-Z400 (12MP) and WB50F (16MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-Z400 was released 6 years earlier than the WB50F and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-Z400 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB50F being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight to a complete comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the EX-Z400 grades vs the WB50F when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-Z400 vs Samsung WB50F Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z400 & Samsung WB50F. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z400 Gallery & Samsung WB50F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z400 over the Samsung WB50F
| EX-Z400 | WB50F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB50F over the Casio EX-Z400
| WB50F | EX-Z400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2014 | January 2009 | More recent by 60 months | |
| Manual focus | More exact focusing | |||
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z400 and Samsung WB50F
| EX-Z400 | WB50F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen sizing | |
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Neither includes Touch screen |
Casio EX-Z400 vs Samsung WB50F Physical Comparison
If you are intending to lug around your camera often, you will want to think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z400 features external dimensions of 95mm x 60mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 130 grams (0.29 lbs) and the Samsung WB50F has sizing of 101mm x 68mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") and a weight of 207 grams (0.46 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-Z400 vs Samsung WB50F in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilising at the time. The following is a front view size comparison of the EX-Z400 compared to the WB50F.

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z400 and WB50F is 95 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-Z400 vs Samsung WB50F Sensor Comparison
Usually, its difficult to envision the gap between sensor measurements simply by looking at specifications. The photograph underneath might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z400 and WB50F.
Plainly, the 2 cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Samsung WB50F to give you more detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The older EX-Z400 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-Z400 vs Samsung WB50F Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-Z400 vs Samsung WB50F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z400 | Samsung WB50F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z400 | Samsung WB50F |
| Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2009-01-08 | 2014-01-07 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.6-7.0 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 1/2 secs | - |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1000 secs | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 130 grams (0.29 lb) | 207 grams (0.46 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 60 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 101 x 68 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-40 | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $0 | $180 |