Casio EX-Z400 vs Sony S2000
95 Imaging
34 Features
25 Overall
30
93 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Casio EX-Z400 vs Sony S2000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.6-7.0) lens
- 130g - 95 x 60 x 23mm
- Launched January 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 33-105mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 167g - 98 x 61 x 27mm
- Launched January 2010
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-Z400 vs Sony S2000 Overview
Its time to look closer at the Casio EX-Z400 vs Sony S2000, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Casio and Sony. The resolution of the EX-Z400 (12MP) and the S2000 (10MP) is relatively well matched and both cameras offer the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-Z400 was revealed 12 months prior to the S2000 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z400 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony S2000 being a Compact camera.
Before delving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick overview of how the EX-Z400 matches up vs the S2000 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-Z400 vs Sony S2000 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z400 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z400 Gallery and Sony S2000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z400 over the Sony S2000
| EX-Z400 | S2000 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony S2000 over the Casio EX-Z400
| S2000 | EX-Z400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2010 |  | January 2009 | More recent by 12 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z400 and Sony S2000
| EX-Z400 | S2000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen sizing |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Equal screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-Z400 vs Sony S2000 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to lug around your camera regularly, you will have to take into account its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z400 provides physical dimensions of 95mm x 60mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 130 grams (0.29 lbs) whilst the Sony S2000 has sizing of 98mm x 61mm x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-Z400 vs Sony S2000 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are employing during that time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the EX-Z400 versus the S2000.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z400 and S2000 is 95 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-Z400 vs Sony S2000 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's hard to envision the contrast between sensor measurements simply by looking at specs. The visual underneath will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z400 and S2000.
All in all, each of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You should count on the Casio EX-Z400 to resolve greater detail because of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The older EX-Z400 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z400 vs Sony S2000 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-Z400 vs Sony S2000 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z400 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Sony |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z400 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2009-01-08 | 2010-01-07 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 33-105mm (3.2x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.6-7.0 | f/3.1-5.6 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1/2 seconds | 1 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1000 seconds | 1/1200 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 1.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.30 m |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 130g (0.29 lbs) | 167g (0.37 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 60 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 98 x 61 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-40 | 2 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, optional SD, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $0 | $225 |