Casio EX-Z450 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370
96 Imaging
35 Features
24 Overall
30
![Casio Exilim EX-Z450 front Casio Exilim EX-Z450 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z450/Casio-EX-Z450-front.jpg)
![Kodak Easyshare M5370 front Kodak Easyshare M5370 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/w300/fronton/Kodak-Easyshare-M5370.jpg)
95 Imaging
39 Features
35 Overall
37
Casio EX-Z450 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.6-5.8) lens
- 128g - 81 x 56 x 21mm
- Revealed August 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F) lens
- 150g - 101 x 58 x 19mm
- Announced September 2011
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-Z450 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Overview
Following is a in-depth comparison of the Casio EX-Z450 versus Kodak Easyshare M5370, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by rivals Casio and Kodak. There is a substantial difference between the image resolutions of the EX-Z450 (12MP) and Easyshare M5370 (16MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
The EX-Z450 was introduced 3 years earlier than the Easyshare M5370 which is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a detailed comparison, below is a short summary of how the EX-Z450 grades versus the Easyshare M5370 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-Z450 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-Z450 & Kodak Easyshare M5370. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-Z450 Gallery & Kodak Easyshare M5370 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z450 over the Kodak Easyshare M5370
EX-Z450 | Easyshare M5370 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very precise focus |
Reasons to pick Kodak Easyshare M5370 over the Casio EX-Z450
Easyshare M5370 | EX-Z450 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2011 | ![]() | August 2009 | More modern by 25 months |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z450 and Kodak Easyshare M5370
EX-Z450 | Easyshare M5370 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Identical screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen |
Casio EX-Z450 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry around your camera often, you'll need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-Z450 has got physical measurements of 81mm x 56mm x 21mm (3.2" x 2.2" x 0.8") having a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs) whilst the Kodak Easyshare M5370 has proportions of 101mm x 58mm x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-Z450 versus Kodak Easyshare M5370 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are using during that time. Here is the front view size comparison of the EX-Z450 vs the Easyshare M5370.
![Casio EX-Z450 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 size comparison Casio EX-Z450 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z450-vs-Kodak-Easyshare-M5370-size-comparison.jpg)
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z450 and Easyshare M5370 is 96 and 95 respectively.
![Casio EX-Z450 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-Z450 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z450-vs-Kodak-Easyshare-M5370-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Casio EX-Z450 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very hard to envision the contrast between sensor sizes just by reviewing specifications. The pic underneath might offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z450 and Easyshare M5370.
Plainly, both of those cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same MP. You can expect the Kodak Easyshare M5370 to deliver greater detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs far more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z450 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
![Casio EX-Z450 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 sensor size comparison Casio EX-Z450 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z450-vs-Kodak-Easyshare-M5370-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Casio EX-Z450 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Screen and ViewFinder
![Casio EX-Z450 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-Z450 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z450-vs-Kodak-Easyshare-M5370-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-Z450 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z450 | Kodak Easyshare M5370 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Kodak |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z450 | Kodak Easyshare M5370 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2009-08-18 | 2011-09-14 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 64 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.6-5.8 | - |
Macro focus range | 10cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1/2s | 8s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | 3.20 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-1, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 128 gr (0.28 lbs) | 150 gr (0.33 lbs) |
Dimensions | 81 x 56 x 21mm (3.2" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 101 x 58 x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-40 | KLIC-7006 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | MicroSD/MicroSDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $229 | $160 |