Casio EX-Z450 vs Ricoh WG-M1
96 Imaging
35 Features
24 Overall
30
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
Casio EX-Z450 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.6-5.8) lens
- 128g - 81 x 56 x 21mm
- Introduced August 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Revealed September 2014
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-Z450 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
The following is a in-depth assessment of the Casio EX-Z450 versus Ricoh WG-M1, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Casio and Ricoh. The image resolution of the EX-Z450 (12MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is fairly close and they possess the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe EX-Z450 was introduced 6 years earlier than the WG-M1 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a full comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the EX-Z450 matches up versus the WG-M1 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-Z450 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-Z450 and Ricoh WG-M1. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-Z450 Gallery and Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z450 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| EX-Z450 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 1.5" | Larger display (+1.5") |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 115k | Sharper display (+115k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Casio EX-Z450
| WG-M1 | EX-Z450 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2014 |  | August 2009 | Newer by 61 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z450 and Ricoh WG-M1
| EX-Z450 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lacking Touch display |
Casio EX-Z450 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to travel with your camera frequently, you're going to have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-Z450 has exterior dimensions of 81mm x 56mm x 21mm (3.2" x 2.2" x 0.8") having a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-M1 has dimensions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") and a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-Z450 versus Ricoh WG-M1 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are working with at that moment. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the EX-Z450 versus the WG-M1.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z450 and WG-M1 is 96 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-Z450 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is tough to visualise the contrast in sensor dimensions purely by viewing technical specs. The image below may provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z450 and WG-M1.
As you have seen, both the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but not the same megapixels. You should anticipate the Ricoh WG-M1 to result in greater detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos a little more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z450 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Casio EX-Z450 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-Z450 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z450 | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z450 | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2009-08-18 | 2014-09-12 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | (1×) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.6-5.8 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 10cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 1.5" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 115k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 1/2s | - |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1000s | - |
| Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 128 grams (0.28 lb) | 190 grams (0.42 lb) |
| Dimensions | 81 x 56 x 21mm (3.2" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 images |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-40 | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $229 | $2,000 |