Casio EX-Z450 vs Samsung SL102
96 Imaging
35 Features
24 Overall
30
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3b31e/3b31ec5d5796305b3877b7df282e1e8aead106cd" alt="Casio Exilim EX-Z450 front Casio Exilim EX-Z450 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ea7e4/ea7e4ee78f1fa0fb4022ac36c31077cfef4a19c1" alt="Samsung SL102 front Samsung SL102 front"
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Casio EX-Z450 vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.6-5.8) lens
- 128g - 81 x 56 x 21mm
- Released August 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2009
- Also Known as ES55
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Casio EX-Z450 vs Samsung SL102 Overview
Here is a in depth assessment of the Casio EX-Z450 versus Samsung SL102, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by brands Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-Z450 (12MP) and the SL102 (10MP) is fairly similar and both cameras boast the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The EX-Z450 was released 8 months later than the SL102 so they are both of a similar generation. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a complete comparison, here is a quick overview of how the EX-Z450 matches up against the SL102 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Casio EX-Z450 vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-Z450 and Samsung SL102. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-Z450 Gallery and Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z450 over the Samsung SL102
EX-Z450 | SL102 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | August 2009 | ![]() | January 2009 | Fresher by 8 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Casio EX-Z450
SL102 | EX-Z450 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-Z450 and Samsung SL102
EX-Z450 | SL102 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Exact same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Missing Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-Z450 vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry your camera frequently, you'll need to factor in its weight and size. The Casio EX-Z450 features outside dimensions of 81mm x 56mm x 21mm (3.2" x 2.2" x 0.8") along with a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs) while the Samsung SL102 has specifications of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-Z450 versus Samsung SL102 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have chosen during that time. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-Z450 against the SL102.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9565e/9565ec79ada4c0fe52cf0ade91a9fea7f7352627" alt="Casio EX-Z450 vs Samsung SL102 size comparison Casio EX-Z450 vs Samsung SL102 size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z450 and SL102 is 96 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/14fcb/14fcb89b4d4e5a8775b1a5262a38a0d1a08e1b0f" alt="Casio EX-Z450 vs Samsung SL102 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-Z450 vs Samsung SL102 top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-Z450 vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its hard to visualise the difference between sensor sizing merely by going over specs. The graphic below should give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z450 and SL102.
All in all, both the cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same megapixels. You should anticipate the Casio EX-Z450 to deliver extra detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics way more aggressively. The more recent EX-Z450 will have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/70a15/70a154acfcf94247b1e4df274b174a890a56bac3" alt="Casio EX-Z450 vs Samsung SL102 sensor size comparison Casio EX-Z450 vs Samsung SL102 sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-Z450 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d12de/d12de99d45e9faaa83930a0894d8c288ca837c09" alt="Casio EX-Z450 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-Z450 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Casio EX-Z450 vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z450 | Samsung SL102 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Samsung |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z450 | Samsung SL102 |
Also called | - | ES55 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2009-08-18 | 2009-01-08 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.6-5.8 | - |
Macro focusing range | 10cm | 10cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 1/2 secs | 8 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 128 grams (0.28 lbs) | 116 grams (0.26 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 81 x 56 x 21mm (3.2" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-40 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $229 | $130 |