Casio EX-Z450 vs Samsung SL620
96 Imaging
34 Features
24 Overall
30
94 Imaging
34 Features
13 Overall
25
Casio EX-Z450 vs Samsung SL620 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.6-5.8) lens
- 128g - 81 x 56 x 21mm
- Introduced August 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-175mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Announced February 2009
- Additionally Known as PL65
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-Z450 vs Samsung SL620 Overview
In this article, we will be comparing the Casio EX-Z450 versus Samsung SL620, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-Z450 (12MP) and the SL620 (12MP) is relatively close and they enjoy the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-Z450 was brought out 7 months later than the SL620 which means that they are both of a similar generation. The two cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-Z450 being a Compact camera and the Samsung SL620 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go through a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief view of how the EX-Z450 grades against the SL620 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-Z450 vs Samsung SL620 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z450 and Samsung SL620. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z450 Gallery and Samsung SL620 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z450 over the Samsung SL620
| EX-Z450 | SL620 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | August 2009 | February 2009 | More recent by 7 months | |
| Manual focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
| Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL620 over the Casio EX-Z450
| SL620 | EX-Z450 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-Z450 and Samsung SL620
| EX-Z450 | SL620 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Exact same screen resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-Z450 vs Samsung SL620 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to lug around your camera regularly, you should factor in its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-Z450 features outside measurements of 81mm x 56mm x 21mm (3.2" x 2.2" x 0.8") with a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL620 has measurements of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-Z450 versus Samsung SL620 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are utilising during that time. Following is the front view over all size comparison of the EX-Z450 compared to the SL620.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z450 and SL620 is 96 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-Z450 vs Samsung SL620 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be tough to imagine the difference in sensor measurements purely by researching specs. The visual here may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z450 and SL620.
As you can plainly see, both cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the same exact megapixels therefore you should expect comparable quality of pictures however you should consider the release date of the cameras into account. The more recent EX-Z450 should have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z450 vs Samsung SL620 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio EX-Z450 vs Samsung SL620 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z450 | Samsung SL620 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z450 | Samsung SL620 |
| Also called as | - | PL65 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2009-08-18 | 2009-02-17 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 35-175mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.6-5.8 | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focusing range | 10cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Display resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1/2 secs | 8 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m | 4.60 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 128 grams (0.28 pounds) | 168 grams (0.37 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 81 x 56 x 21mm (3.2" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-40 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $229 | $200 |