Casio EX-Z450 vs Samsung WB30F
96 Imaging
35 Features
24 Overall
30
96 Imaging
39 Features
33 Overall
36
Casio EX-Z450 vs Samsung WB30F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.6-5.8) lens
- 128g - 81 x 56 x 21mm
- Launched August 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 128g - 98 x 58 x 17mm
- Launched January 2013
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-Z450 vs Samsung WB30F Overview
Here is a in depth review of the Casio EX-Z450 vs Samsung WB30F, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by brands Casio and Samsung. There is a substantial difference among the resolutions of the EX-Z450 (12MP) and WB30F (16MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-Z450 was brought out 4 years earlier than the WB30F and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the EX-Z450 matches up versus the WB30F when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-Z450 vs Samsung WB30F Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-Z450 & Samsung WB30F. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z450 Gallery & Samsung WB30F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z450 over the Samsung WB30F
| EX-Z450 | WB30F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB30F over the Casio EX-Z450
| WB30F | EX-Z450 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2013 |  | August 2009 | Fresher by 41 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z450 and Samsung WB30F
| EX-Z450 | WB30F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen measurements |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | The same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-Z450 vs Samsung WB30F Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry your camera regularly, you need to consider its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-Z450 offers outer dimensions of 81mm x 56mm x 21mm (3.2" x 2.2" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs) while the Samsung WB30F has measurements of 98mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-Z450 vs Samsung WB30F in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilising at the time. Following is a front view size comparison of the EX-Z450 and the WB30F.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z450 and WB30F is 96 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-Z450 vs Samsung WB30F Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very tough to envision the contrast in sensor sizing just by seeing a spec sheet. The photograph below will offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z450 and WB30F.
As you can see, both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the Samsung WB30F to provide more detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures more aggressively. The older EX-Z450 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z450 vs Samsung WB30F Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-Z450 vs Samsung WB30F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z450 | Samsung WB30F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z450 | Samsung WB30F |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2009-08-18 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.6-5.8 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focus range | 10cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display tech | - | QVGA TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 1/2 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 128g (0.28 lbs) | 128g (0.28 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 81 x 56 x 21mm (3.2" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 98 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-40 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $229 | $180 |