Casio EX-Z450 vs Samsung WB35F
96 Imaging
35 Features
24 Overall
30
93 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Casio EX-Z450 vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.6-5.8) lens
- 128g - 81 x 56 x 21mm
- Launched August 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2014
Photography Glossary Casio EX-Z450 vs Samsung WB35F Overview
Below, we will be evaluating the Casio EX-Z450 and Samsung WB35F, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Casio and Samsung. There is a substantial difference between the image resolutions of the EX-Z450 (12MP) and WB35F (16MP) but they feature the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-Z450 was brought out 5 years earlier than the WB35F which is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a in depth comparison, below is a brief overview of how the EX-Z450 grades against the WB35F with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-Z450 vs Samsung WB35F Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-Z450 & Samsung WB35F. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-Z450 Gallery & Samsung WB35F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z450 over the Samsung WB35F
| EX-Z450 | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Casio EX-Z450
| WB35F | EX-Z450 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2014 |  | August 2009 | More modern by 53 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z450 and Samsung WB35F
| EX-Z450 | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Exact same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither offers Touch screen |
Casio EX-Z450 vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry around your camera regularly, you're going to have to think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z450 offers outer dimensions of 81mm x 56mm x 21mm (3.2" x 2.2" x 0.8") and a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Samsung WB35F has sizing of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-Z450 and Samsung WB35F in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are working with at that moment. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the EX-Z450 and the WB35F.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z450 and WB35F is 96 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-Z450 vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison
Often, its tough to picture the contrast between sensor sizes merely by reviewing technical specs. The pic underneath will give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z450 and WB35F.
As you can tell, both cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You can expect the Samsung WB35F to deliver greater detail having its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs much more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z450 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z450 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio EX-Z450 vs Samsung WB35F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z450 | Samsung WB35F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z450 | Samsung WB35F |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2009-08-18 | 2014-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.6-5.8 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focusing range | 10cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1/2s | 8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 10.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 128 gr (0.28 lbs) | 194 gr (0.43 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 81 x 56 x 21mm (3.2" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-40 | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $229 | $130 |