Casio EX-Z550 vs Kodak M575
95 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
![Casio Exilim EX-Z550 front Casio Exilim EX-Z550 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z550/Casio-EX-Z550-front.jpg)
![Kodak EasyShare M575 front Kodak EasyShare M575 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Kodak-EasyShare-M575/Kodak-M575-front.jpg)
95 Imaging
37 Features
24 Overall
31
Casio EX-Z550 vs Kodak M575 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-104mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 143g - 99 x 53 x 20mm
- Released January 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1000
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 19mm
- Released January 2010
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-Z550 vs Kodak M575 Overview
The following is a complete comparison of the Casio EX-Z550 versus Kodak M575, both Ultracompact cameras by companies Casio and Kodak. The sensor resolution of the EX-Z550 (14MP) and the M575 (14MP) is very close and they feature the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
The EX-Z550 was launched within a month of the M575 so they are of a similar generation. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before we go in to a complete comparison, below is a short overview of how the EX-Z550 grades versus the M575 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-Z550 vs Kodak M575 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-Z550 and Kodak EasyShare M575. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-Z550 Gallery and Kodak M575 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z550 over the Kodak M575
EX-Z550 | M575 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Kodak M575 over the Casio EX-Z550
M575 | EX-Z550 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z550 and Kodak M575
EX-Z550 | M575 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2010 | ![]() | January 2010 | Same generation |
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Identical display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither has Touch display |
Casio EX-Z550 vs Kodak M575 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to travel with your camera, you are going to need to think about its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-Z550 has outer dimensions of 99mm x 53mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.1" x 0.8") along with a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs) while the Kodak M575 has measurements of 99mm x 58mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-Z550 versus Kodak M575 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have attached at the time. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the EX-Z550 compared to the M575.
![Casio EX-Z550 vs Kodak M575 size comparison Casio EX-Z550 vs Kodak M575 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z550-vs-Kodak-EasyShare-M575-size-comparison.jpg)
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z550 and M575 is 95 and 95 respectively.
![Casio EX-Z550 vs Kodak M575 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-Z550 vs Kodak M575 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z550-vs-Kodak-EasyShare-M575-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Casio EX-Z550 vs Kodak M575 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is tough to picture the difference in sensor dimensions purely by viewing technical specs. The pic underneath may give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z550 and M575.
As you have seen, each of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the same MP so you should expect comparable quality of images though you have to factor the production date of the cameras into account.
![Casio EX-Z550 vs Kodak M575 sensor size comparison Casio EX-Z550 vs Kodak M575 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z550-vs-Kodak-EasyShare-M575-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Casio EX-Z550 vs Kodak M575 Screen and ViewFinder
![Casio EX-Z550 vs Kodak M575 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-Z550 vs Kodak M575 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z550-vs-Kodak-EasyShare-M575-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-Z550 vs Kodak M575 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z550 | Kodak EasyShare M575 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Kodak |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z550 | Kodak EasyShare M575 |
Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Released | 2010-01-06 | 2010-01-05 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1000 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-104mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.6-5.9 | - |
Macro focus range | - | 10cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1400 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 3.50 m |
Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 143g (0.32 pounds) | 152g (0.34 pounds) |
Dimensions | 99 x 53 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.1" x 0.8") | 99 x 58 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | - | KLIC-7006 |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $149 | $139 |