Casio EX-Z800 vs Casio EX-ZR300
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
92 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43
Casio EX-Z800 vs Casio EX-ZR300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 124g - 91 x 52 x 20mm
- Announced August 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Launched May 2012
Casio EX-Z800 vs Casio EX-ZR300 Overview
Here, we are contrasting the Casio EX-Z800 and Casio EX-ZR300, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are designed by Casio. The resolution of the EX-Z800 (14MP) and the EX-ZR300 (16MP) is very well matched and both cameras provide the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-Z800 was introduced 21 months earlier than the EX-ZR300 making them a generation apart from each other. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-Z800 being a Ultracompact camera and the Casio EX-ZR300 being a Compact camera.
Before we go into a detailed comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the EX-Z800 scores vs the EX-ZR300 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Casio EX-Z800 vs Casio EX-ZR300 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-Z800 & Casio Exilim EX-ZR300. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z800 Gallery & Casio EX-ZR300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z800 over the Casio EX-ZR300
EX-Z800 | EX-ZR300 |
---|
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR300 over the Casio EX-Z800
EX-ZR300 | EX-Z800 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | May 2012 | August 2010 | Fresher by 21 months | |
Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 461k | 230k | Sharper display (+231k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z800 and Casio EX-ZR300
EX-Z800 | EX-ZR300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very exact focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-Z800 vs Casio EX-ZR300 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry your camera often, you'll have to factor in its weight and size. The Casio EX-Z800 provides external measurements of 91mm x 52mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") and a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) while the Casio EX-ZR300 has specifications of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-Z800 and Casio EX-ZR300 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Below is a front view scale comparison of the EX-Z800 vs the EX-ZR300.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z800 and EX-ZR300 is 96 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-Z800 vs Casio EX-ZR300 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is hard to see the gap between sensor sizing merely by reading through a spec sheet. The visual here will give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z800 and EX-ZR300.
Clearly, both of the cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same MP. You can expect to see the Casio EX-ZR300 to resolve extra detail using its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos way more aggressively. The older EX-Z800 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z800 vs Casio EX-ZR300 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-Z800 vs Casio EX-ZR300 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z800 | Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Casio |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z800 | Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 |
Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2010-08-03 | 2012-05-22 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | Exilim Engine HS |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 50 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/3.0-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 461k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | - | Super Clear TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 15s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 4.70 m |
Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 f ps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 124 gr (0.27 pounds) | 205 gr (0.45 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 91 x 52 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 500 shots |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-120 | NP-130 |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $150 | $329 |