Casio EX-Z800 vs FujiFilm S2500HD
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
78 Imaging
35 Features
30 Overall
33
Casio EX-Z800 vs FujiFilm S2500HD Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 124g - 91 x 52 x 20mm
- Revealed August 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Push to 3200)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-504mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 337g - 110 x 73 x 81mm
- Revealed July 2010
- Additionally referred to as FinePix S2600HD
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-Z800 vs FujiFilm S2500HD Overview
The following is a thorough analysis of the Casio EX-Z800 versus FujiFilm S2500HD, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Casio and FujiFilm. The resolution of the EX-Z800 (14MP) and the S2500HD (12MP) is fairly close and they feature the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe EX-Z800 was released at a similar time to the S2500HD and they are of a similar age. The two cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-Z800 being a Ultracompact camera and the FujiFilm S2500HD being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving through a in-depth comparison, below is a quick summation of how the EX-Z800 scores against the S2500HD for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-Z800 vs FujiFilm S2500HD Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-Z800 & FujiFilm FinePix S2500HD. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z800 Gallery & FujiFilm S2500HD Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z800 over the FujiFilm S2500HD
| EX-Z800 | S2500HD | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very exact focusing |
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S2500HD over the Casio EX-Z800
| S2500HD | EX-Z800 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z800 and FujiFilm S2500HD
| EX-Z800 | S2500HD | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | August 2010 |  | July 2010 | Same age |
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Exact same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither includes Touch display |
Casio EX-Z800 vs FujiFilm S2500HD Physical Comparison
If you're intending to travel with your camera often, you need to factor its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z800 features exterior dimensions of 91mm x 52mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) and the FujiFilm S2500HD has sizing of 110mm x 73mm x 81mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 3.2") with a weight of 337 grams (0.74 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-Z800 versus FujiFilm S2500HD in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have attached at that moment. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the EX-Z800 compared to the S2500HD.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z800 and S2500HD is 96 and 78 respectively.
Casio EX-Z800 vs FujiFilm S2500HD Sensor Comparison
Often, it is difficult to see the contrast in sensor dimensions only by looking through specifications. The pic underneath should give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z800 and S2500HD.
To sum up, both of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same megapixels. You can anticipate the Casio EX-Z800 to result in more detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos far more aggressively.
Casio EX-Z800 vs FujiFilm S2500HD Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Casio EX-Z800 vs FujiFilm S2500HD Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z800 | FujiFilm FinePix S2500HD | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z800 | FujiFilm FinePix S2500HD |
| Alternative name | - | FinePix S2600HD |
| Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2010-08-03 | 2010-07-06 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | - | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 50 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 28-504mm (18.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/3.1-5.6 |
| Macro focus range | - | 2cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 99 percent |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.40 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 f ps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 124 gr (0.27 lb) | 337 gr (0.74 lb) |
| Dimensions | 91 x 52 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") | 110 x 73 x 81mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 3.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-120 | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $150 | $200 |