Casio EX-Z800 vs FujiFilm T300
96 Imaging
36 Features
25 Overall
31
94 Imaging
37 Features
28 Overall
33
Casio EX-Z800 vs FujiFilm T300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 124g - 91 x 52 x 20mm
- Released August 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Increase to 3200)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-280mm (F3.4-5.6) lens
- 151g - 97 x 57 x 28mm
- Revealed July 2011
- Alternate Name is FinePix T305
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-Z800 vs FujiFilm T300 Overview
Its time to look closer at the Casio EX-Z800 versus FujiFilm T300, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Casio and FujiFilm. The sensor resolution of the EX-Z800 (14MP) and the T300 (14MP) is very similar and both cameras provide the same sensor size (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-Z800 was unveiled 11 months earlier than the T300 and they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z800 being a Ultracompact camera and the FujiFilm T300 being a Compact camera.
Before going right into a full comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the EX-Z800 scores vs the T300 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-Z800 vs FujiFilm T300 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-Z800 & FujiFilm FinePix T300. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-Z800 Gallery & FujiFilm T300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z800 over the FujiFilm T300
| EX-Z800 | T300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very accurate focus |
Reasons to pick FujiFilm T300 over the Casio EX-Z800
| T300 | EX-Z800 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | July 2011 |  | August 2010 | Fresher by 11 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z800 and FujiFilm T300
| EX-Z800 | T300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Equal display size |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | The same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Missing Touch display |
Casio EX-Z800 vs FujiFilm T300 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry your camera often, you are going to need to consider its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z800 provides outside measurements of 91mm x 52mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") with a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) and the FujiFilm T300 has sizing of 97mm x 57mm x 28mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 151 grams (0.33 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-Z800 versus FujiFilm T300 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the EX-Z800 vs the T300.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z800 and T300 is 96 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-Z800 vs FujiFilm T300 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's hard to visualise the difference between sensor sizing only by going over specifications. The visual underneath will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z800 and T300.
Plainly, each of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the same MP and you can expect similar quality of pictures although you will need to consider the launch date of the products into consideration. The older EX-Z800 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-Z800 vs FujiFilm T300 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-Z800 vs FujiFilm T300 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z800 | FujiFilm FinePix T300 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z800 | FujiFilm FinePix T300 |
| Also referred to as | - | FinePix T305 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2010-08-03 | 2011-07-19 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Max boosted ISO | - | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 50 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 28-280mm (10.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/3.4-5.6 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT color LCD monitor |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 2.60 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 f ps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 124 grams (0.27 lb) | 151 grams (0.33 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 91 x 52 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") | 97 x 57 x 28mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 180 shots |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-120 | NP-45A |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD / SDHC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $150 | $250 |