Casio EX-Z800 vs Fujifilm F200EXR
96 Imaging
36 Features
25 Overall
31


93 Imaging
35 Features
24 Overall
30
Casio EX-Z800 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 124g - 91 x 52 x 20mm
- Launched August 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-140mm (F3.3-5.1) lens
- 205g - 98 x 59 x 23mm
- Launched April 2009

Casio EX-Z800 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Overview
On this page, we are evaluating the Casio EX-Z800 vs Fujifilm F200EXR, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Casio and FujiFilm. The image resolution of the EX-Z800 (14MP) and the Fujifilm F200EXR (12MP) is very comparable but the EX-Z800 (1/2.3") and Fujifilm F200EXR (1/1.6") offer different sensor dimensions.

The EX-Z800 was released 16 months later than the Fujifilm F200EXR making them a generation apart from one another. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z800 being a Ultracompact camera and the Fujifilm F200EXR being a Compact camera.
Before diving right into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the EX-Z800 matches up vs the Fujifilm F200EXR with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Casio EX-Z800 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-Z800 & Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-Z800 Gallery & Fujifilm F200EXR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z800 over the Fujifilm F200EXR
EX-Z800 | Fujifilm F200EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2010 | ![]() | April 2009 | Fresher by 16 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | More accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F200EXR over the Casio EX-Z800
Fujifilm F200EXR | EX-Z800 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z800 and Fujifilm F200EXR
EX-Z800 | Fujifilm F200EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Exact same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-Z800 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-Z800 comes with exterior measurements of 91mm x 52mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") and a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Fujifilm F200EXR has measurements of 98mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-Z800 vs Fujifilm F200EXR in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you select at that time. Following is a front view size comparison of the EX-Z800 against the Fujifilm F200EXR.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z800 and Fujifilm F200EXR is 96 and 93 respectively.

Casio EX-Z800 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Sensor Comparison
Typically, its hard to picture the gap in sensor sizing simply by checking out a spec sheet. The graphic here might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z800 and Fujifilm F200EXR.
As you can see, both of these cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The EX-Z800 due to its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field tougher and the Casio EX-Z800 will produce extra detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images more aggressively. The younger EX-Z800 should have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.

Casio EX-Z800 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-Z800 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z800 | Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | FujiFilm |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z800 | Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR |
Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2010-08-03 | 2009-04-30 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.6" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 8 x 6mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 48.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 50 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/3.3-5.1 |
Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 4.30 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 f ps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 124 gr (0.27 pounds) | 205 gr (0.45 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 91 x 52 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") | 98 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-120 | NP-50 |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | xD Picturecard/SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $150 | $350 |