Casio EX-Z800 vs Fujifilm S2000HD
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
75 Imaging
33 Features
22 Overall
28
Casio EX-Z800 vs Fujifilm S2000HD Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 124g - 91 x 52 x 20mm
- Announced August 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-414mm (F3.5-5.4) lens
- 426g - 111 x 79 x 76mm
- Launched January 2009
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-Z800 vs Fujifilm S2000HD Overview
Following is a in-depth comparison of the Casio EX-Z800 vs Fujifilm S2000HD, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Casio and FujiFilm. There is a large difference between the sensor resolutions of the EX-Z800 (14MP) and Fujifilm S2000HD (10MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-Z800 was released 19 months after the Fujifilm S2000HD which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-Z800 being a Ultracompact camera and the Fujifilm S2000HD being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting through a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick summary of how the EX-Z800 grades vs the Fujifilm S2000HD with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-Z800 vs Fujifilm S2000HD Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z800 & Fujifilm FinePix S2000HD. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z800 Gallery & Fujifilm S2000HD Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z800 over the Fujifilm S2000HD
| EX-Z800 | Fujifilm S2000HD | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | August 2010 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 19 months |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S2000HD over the Casio EX-Z800
| Fujifilm S2000HD | EX-Z800 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-Z800 and Fujifilm S2000HD
| EX-Z800 | Fujifilm S2000HD | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Equivalent screen measurements |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Identical screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-Z800 vs Fujifilm S2000HD Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry around your camera often, you will have to take into account its weight and size. The Casio EX-Z800 enjoys outside dimensions of 91mm x 52mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Fujifilm S2000HD has specifications of 111mm x 79mm x 76mm (4.4" x 3.1" x 3.0") and a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-Z800 vs Fujifilm S2000HD in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are employing at that moment. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the EX-Z800 versus the Fujifilm S2000HD.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z800 and Fujifilm S2000HD is 96 and 75 respectively.
Casio EX-Z800 vs Fujifilm S2000HD Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's tough to see the difference between sensor sizes simply by looking at specs. The image underneath will provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z800 and Fujifilm S2000HD.
All in all, both of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Casio EX-Z800 to give more detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures a little more aggressively. The newer EX-Z800 is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z800 vs Fujifilm S2000HD Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio EX-Z800 vs Fujifilm S2000HD Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z800 | Fujifilm FinePix S2000HD | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z800 | Fujifilm FinePix S2000HD |
| Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2010-08-03 | 2009-01-15 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 50 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 28-414mm (14.8x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/3.5-5.4 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 8.80 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Slow sync, Red-eye reduction |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 f ps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 124 grams (0.27 lbs) | 426 grams (0.94 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 91 x 52 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") | 111 x 79 x 76mm (4.4" x 3.1" x 3.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-120 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $150 | $280 |