Panasonic FX75 vs Pentax K-500
94 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a220c/a220c2e13d4b7304cd494deb3786cbaa31bcfeb7" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7664a/7664a04951cdb8a34b9dfe4c6285125ada24205c" alt="Pentax K-500 front Pentax K-500 front"
64 Imaging
58 Features
70 Overall
62
Panasonic FX75 vs Pentax K-500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.2-5.9) lens
- 165g - 103 x 55 x 23mm
- Announced June 2010
- Additionally referred to as Lumix DMC-FX70
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 51600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 646g - 130 x 97 x 71mm
- Revealed November 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Panasonic FX75 vs Pentax K-500 Overview
Lets look a bit more closely at the Panasonic FX75 vs Pentax K-500, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Panasonic and Pentax. The resolution of the FX75 (14MP) and the K-500 (16MP) is pretty well matched but the FX75 (1/2.3") and K-500 (APS-C) posses totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The FX75 was announced 4 years prior to the K-500 which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Panasonic FX75 being a Compact camera and the Pentax K-500 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before going straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple view of how the FX75 scores versus the K-500 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Panasonic FX75 vs Pentax K-500 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 & Pentax K-500. The whole galleries are available at Panasonic FX75 Gallery & Pentax K-500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX75 over the Pentax K-500
FX75 | K-500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax K-500 over the Panasonic FX75
K-500 | FX75 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | November 2013 | ![]() | June 2010 | Newer by 42 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 921k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+691k dot) |
Common features in the Panasonic FX75 and Pentax K-500
FX75 | K-500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen |
Panasonic FX75 vs Pentax K-500 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to travel with your camera regularly, you need to think about its weight and volume. The Panasonic FX75 has physical dimensions of 103mm x 55mm x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 165 grams (0.36 lbs) whilst the Pentax K-500 has sizing of 130mm x 97mm x 71mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 2.8") and a weight of 646 grams (1.42 lbs).
Check the Panasonic FX75 vs Pentax K-500 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you use during that time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the FX75 vs the K-500.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4e886/4e886f4e696ce9b93790ab3095ad7260c21e0a25" alt="Panasonic FX75 vs Pentax K-500 size comparison Panasonic FX75 vs Pentax K-500 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the FX75 and K-500 is 94 and 64 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6b749/6b749fc52b365b5d7f1ea861156faf3bc98b681f" alt="Panasonic FX75 vs Pentax K-500 top view buttons comparison Panasonic FX75 vs Pentax K-500 top view buttons comparison"
Panasonic FX75 vs Pentax K-500 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very hard to visualise the contrast between sensor dimensions simply by reading through a spec sheet. The picture here should provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the FX75 and K-500.
Clearly, both the cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The FX75 having a tinier sensor will make achieving shallower DOF trickier and the Pentax K-500 will resolve greater detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more aged FX75 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a83af/a83af4cc7664f70ff09a603f8ed8adfb26823fe6" alt="Panasonic FX75 vs Pentax K-500 sensor size comparison Panasonic FX75 vs Pentax K-500 sensor size comparison"
Panasonic FX75 vs Pentax K-500 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7aa43/7aa4308b6c59f18a7538db25f616b669595770be" alt="Panasonic FX75 vs Pentax K-500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Panasonic FX75 vs Pentax K-500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Panasonic FX75 vs Pentax K-500 Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 | Pentax K-500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Panasonic | Pentax |
Model | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 | Pentax K-500 |
Otherwise known as | Lumix DMC-FX70 | - |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level DSLR |
Announced | 2010-06-01 | 2013-11-27 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Venus Engine HD II | PRIME M |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 372.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4928 x 3264 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 51600 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 11 |
Cross focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
Lens focal range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/2.2-5.9 | - |
Macro focus distance | 3cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 151 |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 921k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT LCD monitor with brightness/color adjustment and AR coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.61x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/6000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames/s | 6.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 7.40 m | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync, Slow Sync+Redeye, Trailing Curtain Sync, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30,25,24 fps), 1280 x 720 (60,50,30,25,24 fps), 640 x 424 (30,25,24 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 165 gr (0.36 lb) | 646 gr (1.42 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 103 x 55 x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 130 x 97 x 71mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 79 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.7 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.1 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 1087 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 710 pictures |
Battery style | - | AA |
Battery model | - | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes ( 2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $139 | $600 |