Casio EX-Z800 vs Fujifilm XQ1
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/72ae3/72ae3cba5d945c4704b022d857d153f91ef6548c" alt="Casio Exilim EX-Z800 front Casio Exilim EX-Z800 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7ad94/7ad942cb02690a442d1f78b06f4ac58d3464da20" alt="Fujifilm XQ1 front Fujifilm XQ1 front"
92 Imaging
39 Features
55 Overall
45
Casio EX-Z800 vs Fujifilm XQ1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 124g - 91 x 52 x 20mm
- Revealed August 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 2/3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
- 206g - 100 x 59 x 33mm
- Revealed November 2013
- Successor is Fujifilm XQ2
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Casio EX-Z800 vs Fujifilm XQ1 Overview
Let's look much closer at the Casio EX-Z800 versus Fujifilm XQ1, both Ultracompact digital cameras by competitors Casio and FujiFilm. The resolution of the EX-Z800 (14MP) and the Fujifilm XQ1 (12MP) is relatively similar but the EX-Z800 (1/2.3") and Fujifilm XQ1 (2/3") enjoy different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The EX-Z800 was launched 4 years before the Fujifilm XQ1 which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before going straight into a thorough comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the EX-Z800 grades versus the Fujifilm XQ1 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Casio EX-Z800 vs Fujifilm XQ1 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z800 & Fujifilm XQ1. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z800 Gallery & Fujifilm XQ1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z800 over the Fujifilm XQ1
EX-Z800 | Fujifilm XQ1 |
---|
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XQ1 over the Casio EX-Z800
Fujifilm XQ1 | EX-Z800 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | November 2013 | ![]() | August 2010 | Newer by 40 months |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z800 and Fujifilm XQ1
EX-Z800 | Fujifilm XQ1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-Z800 vs Fujifilm XQ1 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to travel with your camera, you'll need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-Z800 offers external measurements of 91mm x 52mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") with a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Fujifilm XQ1 has proportions of 100mm x 59mm x 33mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.3") with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-Z800 versus Fujifilm XQ1 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the EX-Z800 against the Fujifilm XQ1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f08fd/f08fd9de1ca639bb784617cfc5108f78e1d26e3d" alt="Casio EX-Z800 vs Fujifilm XQ1 size comparison Casio EX-Z800 vs Fujifilm XQ1 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z800 and Fujifilm XQ1 is 96 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5f96a/5f96abdce38b3ec21417f9babfd5d4f3c2e90318" alt="Casio EX-Z800 vs Fujifilm XQ1 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-Z800 vs Fujifilm XQ1 top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-Z800 vs Fujifilm XQ1 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's hard to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions just by reading specs. The picture underneath will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z800 and Fujifilm XQ1.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The EX-Z800 because of its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field harder and the Casio EX-Z800 will offer you more detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z800 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b3da3/b3da376ca2384f810b6a3f4266d43c3afc3ffe8a" alt="Casio EX-Z800 vs Fujifilm XQ1 sensor size comparison Casio EX-Z800 vs Fujifilm XQ1 sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-Z800 vs Fujifilm XQ1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ec400/ec4005915f466e4dac1505ac0a846fceb53d9efe" alt="Casio EX-Z800 vs Fujifilm XQ1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-Z800 vs Fujifilm XQ1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Casio EX-Z800 vs Fujifilm XQ1 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z800 | Fujifilm XQ1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | FujiFilm |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z800 | Fujifilm XQ1 |
Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2010-08-03 | 2013-11-26 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS X-TRANS II |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 2/3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 8.8 x 6.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 58.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 50 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/1.8-4.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.1 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display technology | - | TFT color LCD monitor |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 12.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 7.40 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, on, off, slow syncho |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 f ps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 124 grams (0.27 lbs) | 206 grams (0.45 lbs) |
Dimensions | 91 x 52 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") | 100 x 59 x 33mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 240 photographs |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-120 | NP-48 |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $150 | $500 |