Casio EX-Z800 vs Fujifilm XQ2
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
92 Imaging
39 Features
57 Overall
46
Casio EX-Z800 vs Fujifilm XQ2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 124g - 91 x 52 x 20mm
- Announced August 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 2/3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
- 206g - 100 x 59 x 33mm
- Released January 2015
- Older Model is Fujifilm XQ1
Casio EX-Z800 vs Fujifilm XQ2 Overview
Let's take a deeper look at the Casio EX-Z800 vs Fujifilm XQ2, both Ultracompact digital cameras by competitors Casio and FujiFilm. The image resolution of the EX-Z800 (14MP) and the Fujifilm XQ2 (12MP) is relatively similar but the EX-Z800 (1/2.3") and Fujifilm XQ2 (2/3") offer totally different sensor sizing.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-Z800 was introduced 5 years before the Fujifilm XQ2 and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before delving into a thorough comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the EX-Z800 matches up vs the Fujifilm XQ2 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Casio EX-Z800 vs Fujifilm XQ2 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z800 & Fujifilm XQ2. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-Z800 Gallery & Fujifilm XQ2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z800 over the Fujifilm XQ2
EX-Z800 | Fujifilm XQ2 |
---|
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XQ2 over the Casio EX-Z800
Fujifilm XQ2 | EX-Z800 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2015 | August 2010 | Fresher by 54 months | |
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z800 and Fujifilm XQ2
EX-Z800 | Fujifilm XQ2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very exact focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | No Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-Z800 vs Fujifilm XQ2 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry your camera frequently, you are going to need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-Z800 features external dimensions of 91mm x 52mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") and a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Fujifilm XQ2 has dimensions of 100mm x 59mm x 33mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.3") and a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-Z800 vs Fujifilm XQ2 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have during that time. Below is a front view scale comparison of the EX-Z800 versus the Fujifilm XQ2.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z800 and Fujifilm XQ2 is 96 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-Z800 vs Fujifilm XQ2 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very hard to see the contrast between sensor sizing merely by going over specs. The visual here might offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z800 and Fujifilm XQ2.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The EX-Z800 using its tinier sensor will make shooting shallower DOF tougher and the Casio EX-Z800 will offer extra detail using its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will let you crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The older EX-Z800 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Casio EX-Z800 vs Fujifilm XQ2 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-Z800 vs Fujifilm XQ2 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z800 | Fujifilm XQ2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | FujiFilm |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z800 | Fujifilm XQ2 |
Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2010-08-03 | 2015-01-14 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | EXR Processor II |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS X-TRANS II |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 2/3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 8.8 x 6.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 58.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 50 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/1.8-4.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.1 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT color LCD monitor |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 12.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 7.40 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, on, off, slow syncho |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 f ps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 124 gr (0.27 pounds) | 206 gr (0.45 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 91 x 52 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") | 100 x 59 x 33mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 240 images |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-120 | NP-48 |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $150 | $299 |