Casio EX-Z800 vs Kodak M320
96 Imaging
36 Features
25 Overall
31
95 Imaging
32 Features
10 Overall
23
Casio EX-Z800 vs Kodak M320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 124g - 91 x 52 x 20mm
- Released August 2010
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
- 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
- Revealed January 2009
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-Z800 vs Kodak M320 Overview
Following is a detailed comparison of the Casio EX-Z800 and Kodak M320, both Ultracompact digital cameras by companies Casio and Kodak. There exists a big gap between the image resolutions of the EX-Z800 (14MP) and M320 (9MP) and the EX-Z800 (1/2.3") and M320 (1/2.5") enjoy different sensor measurements.
Photography GlossaryThe EX-Z800 was launched 20 months after the M320 making the cameras a generation away from one another. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before delving through a more detailed comparison, below is a simple overview of how the EX-Z800 matches up vs the M320 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-Z800 vs Kodak M320 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-Z800 and Kodak EasyShare M320. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-Z800 Gallery and Kodak M320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z800 over the Kodak M320
| EX-Z800 | M320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | August 2010 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 20 months |
| Manual focus |  | More accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Casio EX-Z800
| M320 | EX-Z800 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-Z800 and Kodak M320
| EX-Z800 | M320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Equivalent display measurements |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | No Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-Z800 vs Kodak M320 Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry around your camera regularly, you should take into account its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z800 features external measurements of 91mm x 52mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") having a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Kodak M320 has sizing of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") having a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-Z800 and Kodak M320 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you use at the time. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the EX-Z800 against the M320.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z800 and M320 is 96 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-Z800 vs Kodak M320 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's tough to imagine the difference between sensor sizes merely by checking specs. The picture below will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z800 and M320.
All in all, the 2 cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The EX-Z800 featuring a larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field simpler and the Casio EX-Z800 will give greater detail utilizing its extra 5 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop pics a little more aggressively. The younger EX-Z800 provides a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-Z800 vs Kodak M320 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-Z800 vs Kodak M320 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z800 | Kodak EasyShare M320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Kodak |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z800 | Kodak EasyShare M320 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2010-08-03 | 2009-01-08 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.5" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 24.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 9MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3472 x 2604 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 50 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 25 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 34-102mm (3.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/2.8-5.1 |
| Macro focus range | - | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 6.3 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Display resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1400 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 3.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 f ps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 124g (0.27 pounds) | 155g (0.34 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 91 x 52 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") | 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-120 | KLIC-7001 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $150 | $39 |