Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh CX5
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh CX5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 124g - 91 x 52 x 20mm
- Released August 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Released July 2011
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh CX5 Overview
Following is a extensive overview of the Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh CX5, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Casio and Ricoh. There is a substantial difference between the image resolutions of the EX-Z800 (14MP) and CX5 (10MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-Z800 was released 11 months before the CX5 which means that they are of a similar age. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-Z800 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh CX5 being a Compact camera.
Before going in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise view of how the EX-Z800 grades vs the CX5 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh CX5 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z800 & Ricoh CX5. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z800 Gallery & Ricoh CX5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z800 over the Ricoh CX5
| EX-Z800 | CX5 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX5 over the Casio EX-Z800
| CX5 | EX-Z800 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | July 2011 |  | August 2010 | More modern by 11 months |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z800 and Ricoh CX5
| EX-Z800 | CX5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lacking Touch screen |
Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh CX5 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry around your camera, you need to think about its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-Z800 has got physical measurements of 91mm x 52mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") along with a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) while the Ricoh CX5 has measurements of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh CX5 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are working with at the time. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the EX-Z800 compared to the CX5.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z800 and CX5 is 96 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh CX5 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is tough to imagine the contrast between sensor sizes purely by reviewing specifications. The image below may offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z800 and CX5.
Plainly, both the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Casio EX-Z800 to offer greater detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots much more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z800 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh CX5 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh CX5 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z800 | Ricoh CX5 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z800 | Ricoh CX5 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2010-08-03 | 2011-07-19 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 50 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 f ps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 124 gr (0.27 lb) | 205 gr (0.45 lb) |
| Dimensions | 91 x 52 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-120 | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $150 | $399 |