Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh GR
96 Imaging
36 Features
25 Overall
31
90 Imaging
57 Features
54 Overall
55
Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh GR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 124g - 91 x 52 x 20mm
- Announced August 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8) lens
- 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
- Launched April 2013
- Replacement is Ricoh GR II
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh GR Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Casio EX-Z800 versus Ricoh GR, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by competitors Casio and Ricoh. The resolution of the EX-Z800 (14MP) and the GR (16MP) is very well matched but the EX-Z800 (1/2.3") and GR (APS-C) have totally different sensor measurements.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-Z800 was revealed 3 years prior to the GR which is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-Z800 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before getting into a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple summation of how the EX-Z800 scores against the GR in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh GR Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-Z800 & Ricoh GR. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z800 Gallery & Ricoh GR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z800 over the Ricoh GR
| EX-Z800 | GR |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Casio EX-Z800
| GR | EX-Z800 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | April 2013 |  | August 2010 | More modern by 32 months |
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 1230k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+1000k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z800 and Ricoh GR
| EX-Z800 | GR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More precise focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Absent Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh GR Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry around your camera regularly, you will need to factor its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-Z800 comes with physical dimensions of 91mm x 52mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") with a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Ricoh GR has measurements of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-Z800 versus Ricoh GR in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilising at the time. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-Z800 vs the GR.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z800 and GR is 96 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh GR Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very difficult to visualise the gap between sensor sizes purely by checking a spec sheet. The image here might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z800 and GR.
Clearly, both cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The EX-Z800 using its tinier sensor will make shooting shallow DOF more challenging and the Ricoh GR will give you greater detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z800 is going to be behind in sensor tech.
Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh GR Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh GR Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z800 | Ricoh GR | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z800 | Ricoh GR |
| Class | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2010-08-03 | 2013-04-17 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 372.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4928 x 3264 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 50 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/2.8 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 1,230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 300 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 4.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 5.40 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/4000 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 f ps) | 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 124 gr (0.27 lb) | 245 gr (0.54 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 91 x 52 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") | 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 78 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.6 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.5 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 972 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 290 shots |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-120 | DB65 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD, SDHC, SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $150 | $971 |