Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh GR Digital III
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 124g - 91 x 52 x 20mm
- Released August 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Released July 2009
- Replacement is Ricoh GR Digital IV
Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Overview
Here is a extended review of the Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh GR Digital III, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Casio and Ricoh. There exists a sizable gap among the resolutions of the EX-Z800 (14MP) and GR Digital III (10MP) and the EX-Z800 (1/2.3") and GR Digital III (1/1.7") have totally different sensor sizes.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-Z800 was released 13 months later than the GR Digital III making them a generation apart from one another. Both cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z800 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh GR Digital III being a Compact camera.
Before we go into a in-depth comparison, here is a short summation of how the EX-Z800 grades vs the GR Digital III when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-Z800 & Ricoh GR Digital III. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z800 Gallery & Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z800 over the Ricoh GR Digital III
EX-Z800 | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | August 2010 | July 2009 | Fresher by 13 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Casio EX-Z800
GR Digital III | EX-Z800 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z800 and Ricoh GR Digital III
EX-Z800 | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More precise focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | No Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry your camera frequently, you will have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-Z800 provides physical measurements of 91mm x 52mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") along with a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Ricoh GR Digital III has proportions of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") and a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh GR Digital III in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are using at the time. The following is a front view scale comparison of the EX-Z800 compared to the GR Digital III.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z800 and GR Digital III is 96 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be hard to see the difference in sensor sizing merely by looking through a spec sheet. The visual underneath will help give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z800 and GR Digital III.
As you can see, both of these cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The EX-Z800 because of its smaller sensor will make getting shallow DOF more challenging and the Casio EX-Z800 will render more detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop photos more aggressively. The more recent EX-Z800 will have a benefit in sensor tech.
Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z800 | Ricoh GR Digital III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Ricoh |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z800 | Ricoh GR Digital III |
Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2010-08-03 | 2009-07-27 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | GR engine III |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 50 | 64 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Max aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/1.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 1 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 3.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 f ps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 124 gr (0.27 lb) | 208 gr (0.46 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 91 x 52 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-120 | - |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $150 | $399 |