Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
92 Imaging
35 Features
47 Overall
39
Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 124g - 91 x 52 x 20mm
- Revealed August 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Revealed September 2011
- Succeeded the Ricoh GR Digital III
Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Overview
Following is a thorough comparison of the Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV, one is a Ultracompact and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Casio and Ricoh. There exists a crucial gap among the image resolutions of the EX-Z800 (14MP) and GR Digital IV (10MP) and the EX-Z800 (1/2.3") and GR Digital IV (1/1.7") enjoy totally different sensor dimensions.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-Z800 was announced 13 months prior to the GR Digital IV which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. The two cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-Z800 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh GR Digital IV being a Compact camera.
Before getting in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick summary of how the EX-Z800 scores versus the GR Digital IV when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z800 and Ricoh GR Digital IV. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z800 Gallery and Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z800 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
EX-Z800 | GR Digital IV |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Casio EX-Z800
GR Digital IV | EX-Z800 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2011 | August 2010 | More modern by 13 months | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 1230k | 230k | Crisper screen (+1000k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z800 and Ricoh GR Digital IV
EX-Z800 | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very accurate focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you will have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-Z800 provides external dimensions of 91mm x 52mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") having a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Ricoh GR Digital IV has dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") and a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are working with at that moment. The following is the front view physical size comparison of the EX-Z800 against the GR Digital IV.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z800 and GR Digital IV is 96 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is tough to visualise the gap in sensor sizes purely by viewing specs. The pic here will give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z800 and GR Digital IV.
All in all, both of these cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The EX-Z800 using its smaller sensor will make achieving shallower DOF tougher and the Casio EX-Z800 will result in extra detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z800 will be behind in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z800 | Ricoh GR Digital IV | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Ricoh |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z800 | Ricoh GR Digital IV |
Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2010-08-03 | 2011-09-15 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 50 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/1.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 1,230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 1 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 3.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 f ps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 124g (0.27 pounds) | 190g (0.42 pounds) |
Dimensions | 91 x 52 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 390 pictures |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-120 | DB65 |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $150 | $599 |