Clicky

Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV

Portability
96
Imaging
37
Features
25
Overall
32
Casio Exilim EX-Z800 front
 
Ricoh GR Digital IV front
Portability
92
Imaging
35
Features
47
Overall
39

Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Key Specs

Casio EX-Z800
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 50 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
  • 124g - 91 x 52 x 20mm
  • Revealed August 2010
Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28mm (F1.9) lens
  • 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
  • Revealed September 2011
  • Succeeded the Ricoh GR Digital III
Photography Glossary

Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Overview

Following is a thorough comparison of the Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV, one is a Ultracompact and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Casio and Ricoh. There exists a crucial gap among the image resolutions of the EX-Z800 (14MP) and GR Digital IV (10MP) and the EX-Z800 (1/2.3") and GR Digital IV (1/1.7") enjoy totally different sensor dimensions.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The EX-Z800 was announced 13 months prior to the GR Digital IV which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. The two cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-Z800 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh GR Digital IV being a Compact camera.

Before getting in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick summary of how the EX-Z800 scores versus the GR Digital IV when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z800 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV

 EX-Z800 GR Digital IV 

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Casio EX-Z800

 GR Digital IV EX-Z800 
RevealedSeptember 2011August 2010More modern by 13 months
Screen dimension3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution1230k230kCrisper screen (+1000k dot)

Common features in the Casio EX-Z800 and Ricoh GR Digital IV

 EX-Z800 GR Digital IV 
Focus manually Very accurate focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Missing Touch friendly screen

Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Physical Comparison

For anyone who is aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you will have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-Z800 provides external dimensions of 91mm x 52mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") having a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Ricoh GR Digital IV has dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") and a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).

Examine the Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are working with at that moment. The following is the front view physical size comparison of the EX-Z800 against the GR Digital IV.

Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z800 and GR Digital IV is 96 and 92 respectively.

Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Sensor Comparison

Typically, it is tough to visualise the gap in sensor sizes purely by viewing specs. The pic here will give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z800 and GR Digital IV.

All in all, both of these cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The EX-Z800 using its smaller sensor will make achieving shallower DOF tougher and the Casio EX-Z800 will result in extra detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z800 will be behind in sensor innovation.

Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV sensor size comparison

Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Casio EX-Z800
Portrait photography with Ricoh GR Digital IV
35
focusing manually
decent MP (14MP)
lack of manual exposure
can't use external flash
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
41
has manual focus
saves RAW files
megapixel count low (10MP)
small sensor size (1/1.7")
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Casio EX-Z800 Street photography advice
Ricoh GR Digital IV Street photography advice
57
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen does not articulate
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
65
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW files
screen does not articulate
small sensor size (1/1.7")
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-Z800 as a Sports photography camera
Ricoh GR Digital IV as a Sports photography camera
38
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (14MP)
no shutter priority
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
34
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good battery (390 shots)
focal length is fixed (28mm)
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/1.7")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-Z800 as a Travel photography camera
Ricoh GR Digital IV as a Travel photography camera
65
decent MP (14MP)
flash built-in
really wide (27mm)
no Time Lapse mode
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
67
good battery (390 shots)
built-in flash
very good maximum aperture (f1.9)
megapixel count low (10MP)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-Z800 Landscape photography information
Ricoh GR Digital IV Landscape photography information
42
focusing manually
really wide (27mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (14MP)
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
screen is small (2.7")
lack of manual exposure
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
no Time Lapse mode
53
has manual focus
very good maximum aperture (f1.9)
nice screen size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW files
good battery (390 shots)
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (28mm)
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/1.7")
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-Z800 Vlogging advice
Ricoh GR Digital IV Vlogging advice
29
really wide (27mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
low quality video (640 x 480 pxls)
no external mic jack
29
very good maximum aperture (f1.9)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
low res video (640 x 480 pixels)
doesn't have external microphone port
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-Z800 and Ricoh GR Digital IV
 Casio Exilim EX-Z800Ricoh GR Digital IV
General Information
Make Casio Ricoh
Model Casio Exilim EX-Z800 Ricoh GR Digital IV
Type Ultracompact Small Sensor Compact
Revealed 2010-08-03 2011-09-15
Body design Ultracompact Compact
Sensor Information
Chip Exilim Engine 5.0 -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/1.7"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Maximum resolution 4320 x 3240 3648 x 2736
Maximum native ISO 3200 3200
Min native ISO 50 80
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 27-108mm (4.0x) 28mm (1x)
Largest aperture f/3.2-5.9 f/1.9
Macro focus distance - 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 4.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.7 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 230k dot 1,230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Optical (optional)
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 secs 1 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range - 3.00 m
Flash modes Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 f ps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 640x480
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 124g (0.27 pounds) 190g (0.42 pounds)
Dimensions 91 x 52 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 390 pictures
Battery form - Battery Pack
Battery model NP-120 DB65
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC, Internal SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Pricing at launch $150 $599