Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
84 Imaging
53 Features
39 Overall
47
Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 124g - 91 x 52 x 20mm
- Revealed August 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1/9000s Max Shutter
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- 370g - 120 x 70 x 45mm
- Revealed August 2011
Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Overview
Here, we are analyzing the Casio EX-Z800 versus Ricoh GXR Mount A12, one being a Ultracompact and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Casio and Ricoh. The image resolution of the EX-Z800 (14MP) and the GXR Mount A12 (12MP) is very comparable but the EX-Z800 (1/2.3") and GXR Mount A12 (APS-C) have different sensor sizes.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-Z800 was released 12 months prior to the GXR Mount A12 so they are both of a similar generation. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-Z800 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting into a detailed comparison, here is a short overview of how the EX-Z800 matches up versus the GXR Mount A12 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-Z800 and Ricoh GXR Mount A12. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-Z800 Gallery and Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z800 over the Ricoh GXR Mount A12
EX-Z800 | GXR Mount A12 |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR Mount A12 over the Casio EX-Z800
GXR Mount A12 | EX-Z800 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | August 2011 | August 2010 | Fresher by 12 months | |
Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z800 and Ricoh GXR Mount A12
EX-Z800 | GXR Mount A12 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More precise focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither features Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry your camera, you will need to think about its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-Z800 enjoys outside measurements of 91mm x 52mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") having a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 has proportions of 120mm x 70mm x 45mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.8") along with a weight of 370 grams (0.82 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-Z800 versus Ricoh GXR Mount A12 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the EX-Z800 versus the GXR Mount A12.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z800 and GXR Mount A12 is 96 and 84 respectively.
Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor sizing only by going through specs. The photograph here should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z800 and GXR Mount A12.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The EX-Z800 because of its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF tougher and the Casio EX-Z800 will provide more detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop images a good deal more aggressively. The older EX-Z800 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z800 | Ricoh GXR Mount A12 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Ricoh |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z800 | Ricoh GXR Mount A12 |
Category | Ultracompact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2010-08-03 | 2011-08-05 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4288 x 2848 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 50 | 200 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | () |
Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 1 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/9000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 3.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 9.60 m |
Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 f ps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 124 grams (0.27 lb) | 370 grams (0.82 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 91 x 52 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") | 120 x 70 x 45mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 330 photographs |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-120 | DB-90 |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (5 sec, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $150 | $349 |