Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh WG-30
96 Imaging
36 Features
25 Overall
31


91 Imaging
40 Features
34 Overall
37
Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh WG-30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 124g - 91 x 52 x 20mm
- Released August 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 192g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Released October 2014

Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh WG-30 Overview
In this article, we are contrasting the Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh WG-30, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Waterproof by brands Casio and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the EX-Z800 (14MP) and the WG-30 (16MP) is very close and they come with the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").

The EX-Z800 was announced 5 years prior to the WG-30 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-Z800 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh WG-30 being a Compact camera.
Before delving through a in-depth comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the EX-Z800 scores versus the WG-30 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh WG-30 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-Z800 & Ricoh WG-30. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-Z800 Gallery & Ricoh WG-30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z800 over the Ricoh WG-30
EX-Z800 | WG-30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very exact focus |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30 over the Casio EX-Z800
WG-30 | EX-Z800 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | October 2014 | ![]() | August 2010 | More recent by 50 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z800 and Ricoh WG-30
EX-Z800 | WG-30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display sizing | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Equivalent display dimensions |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Equal display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Absent Touch display |
Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh WG-30 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you'll have to factor its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z800 enjoys outer measurements of 91mm x 52mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-30 has sizing of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh WG-30 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have attached during that time. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the EX-Z800 against the WG-30.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z800 and WG-30 is 96 and 91 respectively.

Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh WG-30 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very difficult to visualize the gap in sensor measurements merely by looking through specifications. The photograph here might offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z800 and WG-30.
Plainly, both of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different megapixels. You can expect to see the Ricoh WG-30 to render extra detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics a little more aggressively. The older EX-Z800 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.

Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh WG-30 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh WG-30 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z800 | Ricoh WG-30 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Ricoh |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z800 | Ricoh WG-30 |
Class | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
Released | 2010-08-03 | 2014-10-09 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 50 | 125 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 3.90 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 f ps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 124 gr (0.27 pounds) | 192 gr (0.42 pounds) |
Dimensions | 91 x 52 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 pictures |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-120 | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $150 | $428 |