Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh WG-50
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/72ae3/72ae3cba5d945c4704b022d857d153f91ef6548c" alt="Casio Exilim EX-Z800 front Casio Exilim EX-Z800 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3ac2e/3ac2ec410ac86be34c3479c4117466c247b1411d" alt="Ricoh WG-50 front Ricoh WG-50 front"
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh WG-50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 124g - 91 x 52 x 20mm
- Released August 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Launched May 2017
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh WG-50 Overview
Its time to examine more in depth at the Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh WG-50, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Waterproof by companies Casio and Ricoh. The resolution of the EX-Z800 (14MP) and the WG-50 (16MP) is very comparable and they enjoy the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The EX-Z800 was launched 7 years before the WG-50 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-Z800 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh WG-50 being a Compact camera.
Before diving in to a thorough comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the EX-Z800 matches up versus the WG-50 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh WG-50 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-Z800 and Ricoh WG-50. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z800 Gallery and Ricoh WG-50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z800 over the Ricoh WG-50
EX-Z800 | WG-50 |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Casio EX-Z800
WG-50 | EX-Z800 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | May 2017 | ![]() | August 2010 | Newer by 82 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z800 and Ricoh WG-50
EX-Z800 | WG-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimension | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Identical display measurements |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | The same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch display |
Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh WG-50 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to travel with your camera frequently, you should think about its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-Z800 comes with external measurements of 91mm x 52mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") and a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-50 has dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh WG-50 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have at the time. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the EX-Z800 compared to the WG-50.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f8531/f853133cb1314262642a2c8c422491bf6c22fd33" alt="Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh WG-50 size comparison Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh WG-50 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z800 and WG-50 is 96 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2ff2d/2ff2dade89b5e75c55e32d03fbb70db14abda504" alt="Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh WG-50 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh WG-50 top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh WG-50 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be tough to picture the contrast in sensor dimensions just by seeing technical specs. The pic below may give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z800 and WG-50.
As you can tell, each of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different resolution. You should expect to see the Ricoh WG-50 to show more detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z800 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3bf41/3bf413195be21e87d51c1967e0b359477549845e" alt="Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh WG-50 sensor size comparison Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh WG-50 sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh WG-50 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/22047/220475f5cc5aa1e1893d8304cea967648c232c16" alt="Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh WG-50 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh WG-50 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh WG-50 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z800 | Ricoh WG-50 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Ricoh |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z800 | Ricoh WG-50 |
Class | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
Released | 2010-08-03 | 2017-05-24 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 50 | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
Display resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 8.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | On, off |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 f ps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Yes (Wireless) |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 124 grams (0.27 lb) | 193 grams (0.43 lb) |
Dimensions | 91 x 52 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 photographs |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-120 | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail pricing | $150 | $280 |