Clicky

Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh WG-70

Portability
96
Imaging
37
Features
25
Overall
32
Casio Exilim EX-Z800 front
 
Ricoh WG-70 front
Portability
91
Imaging
43
Features
39
Overall
41

Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh WG-70 Key Specs

Casio EX-Z800
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 50 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
  • 124g - 91 x 52 x 20mm
  • Introduced August 2010
Ricoh WG-70
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Digital Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
  • 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
  • Introduced February 2020
  • Newer Model is Ricoh WG-80
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh WG-70 Overview

In this article, we are reviewing the Casio EX-Z800 versus Ricoh WG-70, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Waterproof by brands Casio and Ricoh. The image resolution of the EX-Z800 (14MP) and the WG-70 (16MP) is very close and they use the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The EX-Z800 was unveiled 10 years earlier than the WG-70 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-Z800 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh WG-70 being a Compact camera.

Before delving straight into a complete comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the EX-Z800 grades vs the WG-70 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z800 over the Ricoh WG-70

 EX-Z800 WG-70 

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the Casio EX-Z800

 WG-70 EX-Z800 
IntroducedFebruary 2020August 2010Newer by 115 months

Common features in the Casio EX-Z800 and Ricoh WG-70

 EX-Z800 WG-70 
Focus manually Dial exact focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display sizing2.7"2.7"Equivalent display measurements
Display resolution230k230kExact same display resolution
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch friendly display Absent Touch friendly display

Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh WG-70 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is planning to travel with your camera often, you will need to consider its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-Z800 provides outer dimensions of 91mm x 52mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") and a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-70 has proportions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).

Compare the Casio EX-Z800 versus Ricoh WG-70 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are using at that time. Below is the front view size comparison of the EX-Z800 against the WG-70.

Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh WG-70 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z800 and WG-70 is 96 and 91 respectively.

Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh WG-70 top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh WG-70 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it is hard to imagine the difference in sensor dimensions merely by looking through a spec sheet. The picture underneath may give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z800 and WG-70.

Clearly, both of those cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different resolution. You should expect to see the Ricoh WG-70 to provide you with greater detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics far more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z800 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.

Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh WG-70 sensor size comparison

Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh WG-70 Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh WG-70 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-Z800 Portrait photography advice
Ricoh WG-70 Portrait photography advice
35
you can focus manually
decent MP (14MP)
manual mode not possible
can't use external flash
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
42
focusing manually
MP count decent (16MP)
provides face detection focus
manual exposure not possible
can't use external flash
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Street photography with Casio EX-Z800
Street photography with Ricoh WG-70
57
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen is fixed
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
62
image stabilization (Digital)
environment sealing
no articulating screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-Z800 Sports photography info
Ricoh WG-70 Sports photography info
38
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (14 megapixels)
no shutter priority mode
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
50
image stabilization (Digital)
MP count decent (16MP)
provides tracking autofocus
environment sealing
no shutter priority
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-Z800 Travel photography highlights
Ricoh WG-70 Travel photography highlights
65
decent MP (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
pretty wide (27mm)
does not have Timelapse mode
does not feature selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f3.2)
71
environment sealing
MP count decent (16MP)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (28mm)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-Z800 Landscape photography factors
Ricoh WG-70 Landscape photography factors
42
you can focus manually
pretty wide (27mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (14 megapixels)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.2)
tiny screen (2.7 inches)
manual mode not possible
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
does not have Timelapse mode
49
focusing manually
reasonably wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Digital)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
environment sealing
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
small screen (2.7 inch)
manual exposure not possible
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-Z800 Vlogging advice
Ricoh WG-70 Vlogging advice
29
pretty wide (27mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
slow max aperture (f3.2)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
low video resolution (640 x 480 pixels)
does not have microphone jack
33
reasonably wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Digital)
provides face detection focus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
missing external mic socket
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh WG-70 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-Z800 and Ricoh WG-70
 Casio Exilim EX-Z800Ricoh WG-70
General Information
Company Casio Ricoh
Model type Casio Exilim EX-Z800 Ricoh WG-70
Class Ultracompact Waterproof
Introduced 2010-08-03 2020-02-04
Physical type Ultracompact Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by Exilim Engine 5.0 -
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4320 x 3240 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 3200 6400
Lowest native ISO 50 125
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points - 9
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 27-108mm (4.0x) 28-140mm (5.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.2-5.9 f/3.5-5.5
Macro focusing distance - 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.7 inches 2.7 inches
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4s 4s
Highest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/4000s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance - 5.50 m (at Auto ISO)
Flash options Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction On, off
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 f ps) 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
Highest video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video data format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Yes (Wireless)
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 124g (0.27 lbs) 193g (0.43 lbs)
Dimensions 91 x 52 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 300 photographs
Battery type - Battery Pack
Battery ID NP-120 -
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote)
Time lapse feature
Storage type SD/SDHC, Internal Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card
Card slots 1 1
Launch cost $150 $280