Casio EX-Z800 vs Samsung HZ35W
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32


91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
Casio EX-Z800 vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 124g - 91 x 52 x 20mm
- Launched August 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Announced June 2010
- Alternate Name is WB650

Casio EX-Z800 vs Samsung HZ35W Overview
Following is a extended comparison of the Casio EX-Z800 versus Samsung HZ35W, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-Z800 (14MP) and the HZ35W (12MP) is very similar and they possess the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").

The EX-Z800 was revealed 2 months after the HZ35W so they are of a similar generation. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-Z800 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung HZ35W being a Compact camera.
Before going straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the EX-Z800 grades against the HZ35W when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Casio EX-Z800 vs Samsung HZ35W Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-Z800 and Samsung HZ35W. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z800 Gallery and Samsung HZ35W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z800 over the Samsung HZ35W
EX-Z800 | HZ35W |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Casio EX-Z800
HZ35W | EX-Z800 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 614k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+384k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z800 and Samsung HZ35W
EX-Z800 | HZ35W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | August 2010 | ![]() | June 2010 | Similar generation |
Manual focus | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | No Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-Z800 vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you should factor in its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z800 has exterior measurements of 91mm x 52mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") and a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Samsung HZ35W has sizing of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-Z800 versus Samsung HZ35W in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising at the time. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the EX-Z800 vs the HZ35W.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z800 and HZ35W is 96 and 91 respectively.

Casio EX-Z800 vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is hard to see the contrast between sensor sizes purely by reviewing specs. The picture here might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z800 and HZ35W.
All in all, the two cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same resolution. You should expect to see the Casio EX-Z800 to deliver more detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop images much more aggressively.

Casio EX-Z800 vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-Z800 vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z800 | Samsung HZ35W | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z800 | Samsung HZ35W |
Other name | - | WB650 |
Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2010-08-03 | 2010-06-16 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 50 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/3.2-5.8 |
Macro focus distance | - | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 614 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 16s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 5.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 f ps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 124 gr (0.27 lb) | 245 gr (0.54 lb) |
Dimensions | 91 x 52 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-120 | SLB-11A |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $150 | $300 |