Casio EX-Z800 vs Samsung NX3000
96 Imaging
36 Features
25 Overall
31
89 Imaging
62 Features
62 Overall
62
Casio EX-Z800 vs Samsung NX3000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 124g - 91 x 52 x 20mm
- Introduced August 2010
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 230g - 117 x 66 x 39mm
- Launched May 2014
- Superseded the Samsung NX2000
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-Z800 vs Samsung NX3000 Overview
Below, we will be contrasting the Casio EX-Z800 versus Samsung NX3000, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. There exists a noticeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the EX-Z800 (14MP) and NX3000 (20MP) and the EX-Z800 (1/2.3") and NX3000 (APS-C) come with totally different sensor sizing.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-Z800 was unveiled 4 years earlier than the NX3000 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-Z800 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung NX3000 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go in to a detailed comparison, below is a short view of how the EX-Z800 matches up versus the NX3000 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-Z800 vs Samsung NX3000 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z800 & Samsung NX3000. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-Z800 Gallery & Samsung NX3000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z800 over the Samsung NX3000
| EX-Z800 | NX3000 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung NX3000 over the Casio EX-Z800
| NX3000 | EX-Z800 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | May 2014 | August 2010 | Fresher by 46 months | |
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 461k | 230k | Crisper screen (+231k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z800 and Samsung NX3000
| EX-Z800 | NX3000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Very exact focus | |||
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-Z800 vs Samsung NX3000 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry your camera, you will need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-Z800 enjoys external dimensions of 91mm x 52mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Samsung NX3000 has proportions of 117mm x 66mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.5") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
See the Casio EX-Z800 versus Samsung NX3000 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at the time. The following is the front view size comparison of the EX-Z800 and the NX3000.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z800 and NX3000 is 96 and 89 respectively.
Casio EX-Z800 vs Samsung NX3000 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's tough to envision the gap in sensor sizing only by viewing specs. The visual below should give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z800 and NX3000.
All in all, each of these cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The EX-Z800 having a smaller sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field harder and the Samsung NX3000 will provide you with more detail having an extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures much more aggressively. The older EX-Z800 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z800 vs Samsung NX3000 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-Z800 vs Samsung NX3000 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z800 | Samsung NX3000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z800 | Samsung NX3000 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Introduced | 2010-08-03 | 2014-05-26 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 20MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 5472 x 3648 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 50 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 35 |
| Cross type focus points | - | 1 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
| Lens zoom range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | - |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | - |
| Number of lenses | - | 32 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 461k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 f ps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 124 grams (0.27 lb) | 230 grams (0.51 lb) |
| Dimensions | 91 x 52 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") | 117 x 66 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 370 shots |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-120 | B740 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2-30 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $150 | $897 |