Casio EX-Z800 vs Samsung WB150F
96 Imaging
36 Features
25 Overall
31
93 Imaging
37 Features
42 Overall
39
Casio EX-Z800 vs Samsung WB150F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 124g - 91 x 52 x 20mm
- Introduced August 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 188g - 107 x 61 x 23mm
- Launched January 2012
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-Z800 vs Samsung WB150F Overview
Here is a in-depth analysis of the Casio EX-Z800 versus Samsung WB150F, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-Z800 (14MP) and the WB150F (14MP) is very well matched and both cameras offer the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-Z800 was introduced 17 months before the WB150F making them a generation apart from each other. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z800 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB150F being a Compact camera.
Before diving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise summary of how the EX-Z800 scores vs the WB150F in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-Z800 vs Samsung WB150F Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-Z800 & Samsung WB150F. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-Z800 Gallery & Samsung WB150F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z800 over the Samsung WB150F
| EX-Z800 | WB150F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB150F over the Casio EX-Z800
| WB150F | EX-Z800 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2012 |  | August 2010 | Fresher by 17 months |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z800 and Samsung WB150F
| EX-Z800 | WB150F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More precise focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | No Touch display |
Casio EX-Z800 vs Samsung WB150F Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry your camera, you will have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-Z800 comes with outer measurements of 91mm x 52mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") having a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) while the Samsung WB150F has proportions of 107mm x 61mm x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 188 grams (0.41 lbs).
See the Casio EX-Z800 versus Samsung WB150F in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the EX-Z800 against the WB150F.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z800 and WB150F is 96 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-Z800 vs Samsung WB150F Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor sizing merely by looking at specifications. The visual below will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z800 and WB150F.
Plainly, both the cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the exact same MP so you can expect similar quality of images but you should always factor the launch date of the products into consideration. The older EX-Z800 is going to be behind in sensor tech.
Casio EX-Z800 vs Samsung WB150F Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-Z800 vs Samsung WB150F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z800 | Samsung WB150F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z800 | Samsung WB150F |
| Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2010-08-03 | 2012-01-09 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 50 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 16 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.50 m |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 f ps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 124g (0.27 lbs) | 188g (0.41 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 91 x 52 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") | 107 x 61 x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-120 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $150 | $230 |