Casio EX-Z800 vs Samsung WB30F
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
96 Imaging
39 Features
33 Overall
36
Casio EX-Z800 vs Samsung WB30F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 124g - 91 x 52 x 20mm
- Launched August 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 128g - 98 x 58 x 17mm
- Announced January 2013
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-Z800 vs Samsung WB30F Overview
Its time to look a little more closely at the Casio EX-Z800 vs Samsung WB30F, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-Z800 (14MP) and the WB30F (16MP) is fairly similar and both cameras provide the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-Z800 was announced 3 years earlier than the WB30F which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z800 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB30F being a Compact camera.
Before getting right into a in-depth comparison, here is a short introduction of how the EX-Z800 grades versus the WB30F in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-Z800 vs Samsung WB30F Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-Z800 & Samsung WB30F. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z800 Gallery & Samsung WB30F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z800 over the Samsung WB30F
| EX-Z800 | WB30F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB30F over the Casio EX-Z800
| WB30F | EX-Z800 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2013 |  | August 2010 | More modern by 29 months |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z800 and Samsung WB30F
| EX-Z800 | WB30F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Identical display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-Z800 vs Samsung WB30F Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry around your camera, you will have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-Z800 has got outside dimensions of 91mm x 52mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") and a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Samsung WB30F has dimensions of 98mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-Z800 vs Samsung WB30F in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilising during that time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-Z800 versus the WB30F.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z800 and WB30F is 96 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-Z800 vs Samsung WB30F Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is tough to imagine the contrast between sensor sizes simply by going over a spec sheet. The pic below will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z800 and WB30F.
Clearly, both of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different MP. You can anticipate the Samsung WB30F to offer you extra detail with its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop photos more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z800 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-Z800 vs Samsung WB30F Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-Z800 vs Samsung WB30F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z800 | Samsung WB30F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z800 | Samsung WB30F |
| Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2010-08-03 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 50 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | - | QVGA TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 f ps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 124 gr (0.27 lb) | 128 gr (0.28 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 91 x 52 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") | 98 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-120 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $150 | $180 |