Casio EX-Z800 vs Samsung WB50F
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
92 Imaging
40 Features
36 Overall
38
Casio EX-Z800 vs Samsung WB50F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 124g - 91 x 52 x 20mm
- Introduced August 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 207g - 101 x 68 x 27mm
- Released January 2014
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-Z800 vs Samsung WB50F Overview
Below, we are matching up the Casio EX-Z800 and Samsung WB50F, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-Z800 (14MP) and the WB50F (16MP) is very close and they come with the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe EX-Z800 was unveiled 4 years prior to the WB50F which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-Z800 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB50F being a Compact camera.
Before going straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a short summation of how the EX-Z800 matches up versus the WB50F in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-Z800 vs Samsung WB50F Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-Z800 & Samsung WB50F. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z800 Gallery & Samsung WB50F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z800 over the Samsung WB50F
| EX-Z800 | WB50F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB50F over the Casio EX-Z800
| WB50F | EX-Z800 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2014 |  | August 2010 | More modern by 41 months |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z800 and Samsung WB50F
| EX-Z800 | WB50F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither comes with Touch display |
Casio EX-Z800 vs Samsung WB50F Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera often, you have to take into account its weight and size. The Casio EX-Z800 comes with outer dimensions of 91mm x 52mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Samsung WB50F has specifications of 101mm x 68mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 207 grams (0.46 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-Z800 and Samsung WB50F in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have during that time. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the EX-Z800 against the WB50F.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z800 and WB50F is 96 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-Z800 vs Samsung WB50F Sensor Comparison
Typically, its hard to picture the contrast in sensor sizes simply by looking through specifications. The picture here will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z800 and WB50F.
To sum up, both cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different megapixels. You can expect to see the Samsung WB50F to result in greater detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics much more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z800 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Casio EX-Z800 vs Samsung WB50F Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-Z800 vs Samsung WB50F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z800 | Samsung WB50F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z800 | Samsung WB50F |
| Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2010-08-03 | 2014-01-07 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 50 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | - |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 f ps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 124 grams (0.27 lbs) | 207 grams (0.46 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 91 x 52 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") | 101 x 68 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-120 | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $150 | $180 |