Casio EX-Z800 vs Samsung WB800F
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Casio EX-Z800 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 124g - 91 x 52 x 20mm
- Introduced August 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Released January 2013
Casio EX-Z800 vs Samsung WB800F Overview
Following is a complete review of the Casio EX-Z800 and Samsung WB800F, one is a Ultracompact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-Z800 (14MP) and the WB800F (16MP) is pretty similar and both cameras provide the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-Z800 was introduced 3 years prior to the WB800F which is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z800 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight to a thorough comparison, here is a quick view of how the EX-Z800 scores against the WB800F in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Casio EX-Z800 vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-Z800 and Samsung WB800F. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z800 Gallery and Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z800 over the Samsung WB800F
EX-Z800 | WB800F |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Casio EX-Z800
WB800F | EX-Z800 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2013 | August 2010 | More modern by 29 months | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z800 and Samsung WB800F
EX-Z800 | WB800F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More exact focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Casio EX-Z800 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry around your camera often, you're going to have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-Z800 has got outside measurements of 91mm x 52mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") and a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB800F has measurements of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") having a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-Z800 and Samsung WB800F in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have attached at that time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-Z800 compared to the WB800F.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z800 and WB800F is 96 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-Z800 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's hard to picture the difference between sensor sizes simply by going over specifications. The image here might give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z800 and WB800F.
To sum up, the two cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different MP. You should expect the Samsung WB800F to deliver more detail using its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z800 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z800 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-Z800 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z800 | Samsung WB800F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z800 | Samsung WB800F |
Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2010-08-03 | 2013-01-07 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 50 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 16 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 f ps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 124 gr (0.27 lbs) | 218 gr (0.48 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 91 x 52 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-120 | - |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $150 | $300 |