Casio EX-Z800 vs Samsung WB850F
96 Imaging
36 Features
25 Overall
31
91 Imaging
38 Features
51 Overall
43
Casio EX-Z800 vs Samsung WB850F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 124g - 91 x 52 x 20mm
- Launched August 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 250g - 109 x 62 x 25mm
- Launched January 2012
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-Z800 vs Samsung WB850F Overview
Following is a comprehensive comparison of the Casio EX-Z800 vs Samsung WB850F, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-Z800 (14MP) and the WB850F (16MP) is fairly similar and they possess the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe EX-Z800 was released 17 months before the WB850F making the cameras a generation away from one another. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-Z800 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB850F being a Compact camera.
Before diving through a detailed comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the EX-Z800 matches up versus the WB850F in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-Z800 vs Samsung WB850F Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-Z800 & Samsung WB850F. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z800 Gallery & Samsung WB850F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z800 over the Samsung WB850F
| EX-Z800 | WB850F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB850F over the Casio EX-Z800
| WB850F | EX-Z800 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2012 | August 2010 | More modern by 17 months | |
| Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 614k | 230k | Sharper display (+384k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z800 and Samsung WB850F
| EX-Z800 | WB850F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Lack of Touch display |
Casio EX-Z800 vs Samsung WB850F Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry around your camera regularly, you should factor its weight and size. The Casio EX-Z800 has outside measurements of 91mm x 52mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Samsung WB850F has specifications of 109mm x 62mm x 25mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-Z800 vs Samsung WB850F in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have attached during that time. Below is the front view proportions comparison of the EX-Z800 versus the WB850F.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z800 and WB850F is 96 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-Z800 vs Samsung WB850F Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's tough to imagine the contrast between sensor sizes purely by going over specifications. The picture below may offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z800 and WB850F.
Plainly, both of those cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different megapixels. You can anticipate the Samsung WB850F to deliver more detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z800 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-Z800 vs Samsung WB850F Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio EX-Z800 vs Samsung WB850F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z800 | Samsung WB850F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z800 | Samsung WB850F |
| Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2010-08-03 | 2012-01-09 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 50 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 614 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | - | AMOLED display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.50 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 f ps) | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 480fps (176 x 128), 240fps (384 x 288) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 124 gr (0.27 lb) | 250 gr (0.55 lb) |
| Dimensions | 91 x 52 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") | 109 x 62 x 25mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-120 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $150 | $599 |