Casio EX-Z800 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/72ae3/72ae3cba5d945c4704b022d857d153f91ef6548c" alt="Casio Exilim EX-Z800 front Casio Exilim EX-Z800 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/46cfd/46cfd6b1b2504d733a07dd4a231b6abe09baa859" alt="Sigma SD1 Merrill front Sigma SD1 Merrill front"
57 Imaging
56 Features
45 Overall
51
Casio EX-Z800 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 124g - 91 x 52 x 20mm
- Released August 2010
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 790g - 146 x 113 x 80mm
- Released April 2012
- Replaced the Sigma SD1
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Casio EX-Z800 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Overview
In this article, we are comparing the Casio EX-Z800 versus Sigma SD1 Merrill, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Advanced DSLR by companies Casio and Sigma. The resolution of the EX-Z800 (14MP) and the SD1 Merrill (15MP) is fairly close but the EX-Z800 (1/2.3") and SD1 Merrill (APS-C) use different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The EX-Z800 was unveiled 20 months prior to the SD1 Merrill making the cameras a generation away from one another. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-Z800 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sigma SD1 Merrill being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before getting in to a thorough comparison, below is a concise summation of how the EX-Z800 grades vs the SD1 Merrill for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Casio EX-Z800 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-Z800 & Sigma SD1 Merrill. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z800 Gallery & Sigma SD1 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z800 over the Sigma SD1 Merrill
EX-Z800 | SD1 Merrill |
---|
Reasons to pick Sigma SD1 Merrill over the Casio EX-Z800
SD1 Merrill | EX-Z800 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | April 2012 | ![]() | August 2010 | Newer by 20 months |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z800 and Sigma SD1 Merrill
EX-Z800 | SD1 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Missing Touch display |
Casio EX-Z800 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Physical Comparison
In case you're going to travel with your camera frequently, you should think about its weight and size. The Casio EX-Z800 enjoys physical measurements of 91mm x 52mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") having a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Sigma SD1 Merrill has specifications of 146mm x 113mm x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") accompanied by a weight of 790 grams (1.74 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-Z800 versus Sigma SD1 Merrill in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are working with at the time. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the EX-Z800 versus the SD1 Merrill.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b1d49/b1d49e603f7f4325ada3c214356c189bf0b03a7b" alt="Casio EX-Z800 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill size comparison Casio EX-Z800 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z800 and SD1 Merrill is 96 and 57 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/188fc/188fc71982a8f8a5ddfcdc893e4c51802d33a6e3" alt="Casio EX-Z800 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill top view buttons comparison Casio EX-Z800 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-Z800 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's hard to picture the difference in sensor dimensions simply by researching technical specs. The picture underneath should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z800 and SD1 Merrill.
As you have seen, both of the cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The EX-Z800 having a smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF trickier and the Sigma SD1 Merrill will provide you with extra detail having an extra 1MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images far more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z800 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/20a7f/20a7fd900e977b119e7e8336c54931b5978f1d25" alt="Casio EX-Z800 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill sensor size comparison Casio EX-Z800 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-Z800 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/761eb/761ebb8dc8e52549fa98da663ccf59960d1cc4ed" alt="Casio EX-Z800 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-Z800 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Casio EX-Z800 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z800 | Sigma SD1 Merrill | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Sigma |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z800 | Sigma SD1 Merrill |
Class | Ultracompact | Advanced DSLR |
Released | 2010-08-03 | 2012-04-10 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Exilim Engine 5.0 | Dual True II |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 24 x 16mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 384.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 15 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4800 x 3200 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 50 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens focal range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | - |
Number of lenses | - | 76 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 96% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | - |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 f ps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | None |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 124 gr (0.27 pounds) | 790 gr (1.74 pounds) |
Dimensions | 91 x 52 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") | 146 x 113 x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-120 | - |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | Compact Flash (Type I, UDMA compatible) |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $150 | $2,339 |