Casio EX-Z800 vs Sigma SD9
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32


54 Imaging
38 Features
27 Overall
33
Casio EX-Z800 vs Sigma SD9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 124g - 91 x 52 x 20mm
- Launched August 2010
(Full Review)
- 3MP - APS-C Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
- Announced November 2002
- Successor is Sigma SD10

Casio EX-Z800 vs Sigma SD9 Overview
Here is a comprehensive assessment of the Casio EX-Z800 and Sigma SD9, one being a Ultracompact and the other is a Advanced DSLR by brands Casio and Sigma. There is a huge difference among the sensor resolutions of the EX-Z800 (14MP) and SD9 (3MP) and the EX-Z800 (1/2.3") and SD9 (APS-C) possess different sensor dimensions.

The EX-Z800 was unveiled 7 years later than the SD9 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-Z800 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sigma SD9 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before delving straight into a detailed comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the EX-Z800 matches up vs the SD9 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Casio EX-Z800 vs Sigma SD9 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-Z800 and Sigma SD9. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-Z800 Gallery and Sigma SD9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z800 over the Sigma SD9
EX-Z800 | SD9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | August 2010 | ![]() | November 2002 | Fresher by 94 months |
Display sizing | 2.7" | ![]() | 1.8" | Larger display (+0.9") |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 130k | Clearer display (+100k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD9 over the Casio EX-Z800
SD9 | EX-Z800 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-Z800 and Sigma SD9
EX-Z800 | SD9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Missing Touch display |
Casio EX-Z800 vs Sigma SD9 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry your camera often, you're going to have to factor in its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z800 offers outer dimensions of 91mm x 52mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") with a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Sigma SD9 has sizing of 152mm x 120mm x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") along with a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-Z800 and Sigma SD9 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Below is the front view over all size comparison of the EX-Z800 against the SD9.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z800 and SD9 is 96 and 54 respectively.

Casio EX-Z800 vs Sigma SD9 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's hard to imagine the difference in sensor sizing merely by looking through technical specs. The visual underneath should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z800 and SD9.
As you can tell, both cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The EX-Z800 using its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field more challenging and the Casio EX-Z800 will provide you with greater detail having an extra 11MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop photos far more aggressively. The more modern EX-Z800 provides an advantage in sensor innovation.

Casio EX-Z800 vs Sigma SD9 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-Z800 vs Sigma SD9 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z800 | Sigma SD9 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Sigma |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z800 | Sigma SD9 |
Category | Ultracompact | Advanced DSLR |
Launched | 2010-08-03 | 2002-11-26 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 285.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 3 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 2268 x 1512 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 400 |
Minimum native ISO | 50 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens focal range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | - |
Available lenses | - | 76 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.7 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inches | 1.8 inches |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 130k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 98 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.77x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/6000 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | - |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | - | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 f ps) | - |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | None |
Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 124 grams (0.27 lbs) | 950 grams (2.09 lbs) |
Dimensions | 91 x 52 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") | 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-120 | - |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | Compact Flash Type I or II |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $150 | $3,001 |