Clicky

Casio EX-Z90 vs FujiFilm S200EXR

Portability
96
Imaging
34
Features
17
Overall
27
Casio Exilim EX-Z90 front
 
FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR front
Portability
54
Imaging
35
Features
29
Overall
32

Casio EX-Z90 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Key Specs

Casio EX-Z90
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 35-105mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
  • 121g - 90 x 52 x 19mm
  • Announced August 2009
FujiFilm S200EXR
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200 (Boost to 12800)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 31-436mm (F2.8-5.3) lens
  • 865g - 133 x 94 x 145mm
  • Released July 2009
  • Additionally Known as FinePix S205EXR
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Casio EX-Z90 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Overview

Below is a thorough analysis of the Casio EX-Z90 vs FujiFilm S200EXR, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Casio and FujiFilm. The image resolution of the EX-Z90 (12MP) and the S200EXR (12MP) is pretty similar but the EX-Z90 (1/2.3") and S200EXR (1/1.6") feature totally different sensor measurements.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The EX-Z90 was launched at a similar time to the S200EXR which means that they are both of a similar age. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-Z90 being a Compact camera and the FujiFilm S200EXR being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before going in to a in depth comparison, below is a brief summation of how the EX-Z90 matches up versus the S200EXR in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

        

Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z90 over the FujiFilm S200EXR

 EX-Z90 S200EXR 

Reasons to pick FujiFilm S200EXR over the Casio EX-Z90

 S200EXR EX-Z90 

Common features in the Casio EX-Z90 and FujiFilm S200EXR

 EX-Z90 S200EXR 
ReleasedAugust 2009July 2009Similar age
Focus manually Very accurate focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimension2.7"2.7"Identical screen measurements
Screen resolution230k230kThe same screen resolution
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither features Touch friendly screen

Casio EX-Z90 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Physical Comparison

For anybody who is going to lug around your camera, you will have to consider its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-Z90 enjoys physical dimensions of 90mm x 52mm x 19mm (3.5" x 2.0" x 0.7") having a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs) while the FujiFilm S200EXR has proportions of 133mm x 94mm x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") with a weight of 865 grams (1.91 lbs).

Contrast the Casio EX-Z90 vs FujiFilm S200EXR in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are working with at that time. The following is the front view size comparison of the EX-Z90 against the S200EXR.

Casio EX-Z90 vs FujiFilm S200EXR size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z90 and S200EXR is 96 and 54 respectively.

Casio EX-Z90 vs FujiFilm S200EXR top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-Z90 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it's hard to see the gap between sensor measurements simply by reviewing a spec sheet. The graphic here may offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z90 and S200EXR.

Clearly, the 2 cameras have got the exact same megapixel count albeit not the same sensor measurements. The EX-Z90 contains the tinier sensor which should make obtaining shallower DOF more challenging.

Casio EX-Z90 vs FujiFilm S200EXR sensor size comparison

Casio EX-Z90 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-Z90 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Casio EX-Z90
Portrait photography with FujiFilm S200EXR
27
has manual focus
manual exposure not available
external flash not possible
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
45
has manual focus
has face detect focus
delivers RAW files
MP count low (12MP)
small sensor size (1/1.6")
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Casio EX-Z90 Street photography info
FujiFilm S200EXR Street photography info
55
lighter than average in class (121g)
fixed screen
does not have image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
45
built in image stabilization (Optical)
delivers RAW files
no moving screen
small sensor size (1/1.6")
more heavy than others in class (865 grams)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-Z90 Sports photography information
FujiFilm S200EXR Sports photography information
17
no shutter priority
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
34
amazing zoom range (31-436mm 14.1 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
slow continuous shooting (2.0 frames/s)
MP count low (12MP)
small sensor size (1/1.6")
lacks phase detect auto focus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Casio EX-Z90
Travel photography with FujiFilm S200EXR
56
lighter than average in class (121 grams)
has built in flash
missing Timelapse function
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not good (35mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
38
built-in flash
long zoom (436mm)
no Timelapse mode
more heavy than others in class (865 grams)
MP count low (12MP)
does not have selfie friendly screen
wide angle not good (31mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-Z90 as a Landscape photography camera
FujiFilm S200EXR as a Landscape photography camera
27
has manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (35mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
screen is small (2.7")
manual exposure not available
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
missing Timelapse function
34
has manual focus
built in image stabilization (Optical)
delivers RAW files
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (31mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inches)
MP count low (12MP)
small sensor size (1/1.6")
no Timelapse mode
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-Z90 Vlogging features
FujiFilm S200EXR Vlogging features
25
lighter than average in class (121 grams)
wide angle not good (35mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
screen isn't selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
low quality video (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing microphone socket
19
built in image stabilization (Optical)
has face detect focus
wide angle not good (31mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
does not have selfie friendly screen
video res low (640 x 480 resolution)
no microphone jack
more heavy than others in class (865 grams)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Casio EX-Z90 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-Z90 and FujiFilm S200EXR
 Casio Exilim EX-Z90FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR
General Information
Brand Casio FujiFilm
Model Casio Exilim EX-Z90 FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR
Also called as - FinePix S205EXR
Type Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2009-08-18 2009-07-22
Body design Compact SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Processor Chip Digic 4 EXR
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/1.6"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 8 x 6mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 48.0mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 12MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4000 x 3000 4000 x 3000
Maximum native ISO 1600 3200
Maximum enhanced ISO - 12800
Min native ISO 64 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 35-105mm (3.0x) 31-436mm (14.1x)
Largest aperture f/3.1-5.9 f/2.8-5.3
Macro focus range 10cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 4.5
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.7" 2.7"
Resolution of screen 230k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4 seconds 30 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed - 2.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 3.00 m 7.20 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 121 grams (0.27 lbs) 865 grams (1.91 lbs)
Dimensions 90 x 52 x 19mm (3.5" x 2.0" x 0.7") 133 x 94 x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model NP-60 NP-140
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Launch cost $150 $500