Casio EX-Z90 vs Olympus 9000
96 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6b663/6b663d3ae76c6d6fac0b0f755878af948f202597" alt="Casio Exilim EX-Z90 front Casio Exilim EX-Z90 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6cd55/6cd55e755b246a73ebaa42d5216b8beb3a328143" alt="Olympus Stylus 9000 front Olympus Stylus 9000 front"
92 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
Casio EX-Z90 vs Olympus 9000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-105mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 121g - 90 x 52 x 19mm
- Launched August 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Launched May 2009
- Also Known as mju 9000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Casio EX-Z90 vs Olympus 9000 Overview
Here is a extended assessment of the Casio EX-Z90 vs Olympus 9000, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by rivals Casio and Olympus. The resolution of the EX-Z90 (12MP) and the 9000 (12MP) is very comparable and both cameras provide the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The EX-Z90 was brought out 4 months later than the 9000 so they are both of a similar generation. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a complete comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the EX-Z90 grades versus the 9000 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Casio EX-Z90 vs Olympus 9000 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-Z90 and Olympus Stylus 9000. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-Z90 Gallery and Olympus 9000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z90 over the Olympus 9000
EX-Z90 | 9000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Casio EX-Z90
9000 | EX-Z90 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-Z90 and Olympus 9000
EX-Z90 | 9000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2009 | ![]() | May 2009 | Same generation |
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display size | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Same display measurement |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | The same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither includes Touch display |
Casio EX-Z90 vs Olympus 9000 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry your camera frequently, you should take into account its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-Z90 features outside measurements of 90mm x 52mm x 19mm (3.5" x 2.0" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Olympus 9000 has dimensions of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-Z90 vs Olympus 9000 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you choose during that time. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-Z90 and the 9000.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a220b/a220b6d6b515e169e0493afcb04e6fd22d3eb25d" alt="Casio EX-Z90 vs Olympus 9000 size comparison Casio EX-Z90 vs Olympus 9000 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z90 and 9000 is 96 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e8447/e844709f586b8513693dc451d65f473fc24481d3" alt="Casio EX-Z90 vs Olympus 9000 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-Z90 vs Olympus 9000 top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-Z90 vs Olympus 9000 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is tough to envision the gap in sensor sizing purely by checking out technical specs. The visual here might offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z90 and 9000.
As you can tell, each of these cameras feature the identical sensor size and the identical resolution so you should expect comparable quality of images however you should really take the release date of the cameras into account.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b4e97/b4e97c4e755ddad49e04709a1b0b8a340fd3141f" alt="Casio EX-Z90 vs Olympus 9000 sensor size comparison Casio EX-Z90 vs Olympus 9000 sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-Z90 vs Olympus 9000 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/86b88/86b88cfb433d9156aea25044663b15444fb2e1a5" alt="Casio EX-Z90 vs Olympus 9000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-Z90 vs Olympus 9000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Casio EX-Z90 vs Olympus 9000 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z90 | Olympus Stylus 9000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Olympus |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z90 | Olympus Stylus 9000 |
Also referred to as | - | mju 9000 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2009-08-18 | 2009-05-14 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Digic 4 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 50 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 28-280mm (10.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/3.2-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 10cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | 5.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 121 grams (0.27 lb) | 225 grams (0.50 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 90 x 52 x 19mm (3.5" x 2.0" x 0.7") | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-60 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (12 seconds) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $150 | $300 |