Casio EX-Z90 vs Olympus SH-1
96 Imaging
34 Features
17 Overall
27
88 Imaging
40 Features
53 Overall
45
Casio EX-Z90 vs Olympus SH-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-105mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 121g - 90 x 52 x 19mm
- Announced August 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Released March 2014
- Refreshed by Olympus SH-2
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-Z90 vs Olympus SH-1 Overview
Below, we will be matching up the Casio EX-Z90 vs Olympus SH-1, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Casio and Olympus. There exists a sizeable gap among the resolutions of the EX-Z90 (12MP) and SH-1 (16MP) but they come with the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-Z90 was unveiled 5 years prior to the SH-1 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a quick view of how the EX-Z90 scores versus the SH-1 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-Z90 vs Olympus SH-1 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-Z90 and Olympus Stylus SH-1. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z90 Gallery and Olympus SH-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z90 over the Olympus SH-1
| EX-Z90 | SH-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial precise focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-1 over the Casio EX-Z90
| SH-1 | EX-Z90 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | March 2014 |  | August 2009 | Fresher by 56 months |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z90 and Olympus SH-1
| EX-Z90 | SH-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen |
Casio EX-Z90 vs Olympus SH-1 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry your camera regularly, you'll need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-Z90 enjoys exterior dimensions of 90mm x 52mm x 19mm (3.5" x 2.0" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Olympus SH-1 has measurements of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") with a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-Z90 vs Olympus SH-1 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the EX-Z90 and the SH-1.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z90 and SH-1 is 96 and 88 respectively.
Casio EX-Z90 vs Olympus SH-1 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's hard to visualize the gap in sensor sizing just by looking through specs. The graphic below will offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z90 and SH-1.
As you can plainly see, both cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different MP. You should expect the Olympus SH-1 to result in greater detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The older EX-Z90 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-Z90 vs Olympus SH-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio EX-Z90 vs Olympus SH-1 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z90 | Olympus Stylus SH-1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z90 | Olympus Stylus SH-1 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2009-08-18 | 2014-03-31 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Digic 4 | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/3.0-6.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 10cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 12.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 121 grams (0.27 lb) | 271 grams (0.60 lb) |
| Dimensions | 90 x 52 x 19mm (3.5" x 2.0" x 0.7") | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 380 pictures |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-60 | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $150 | $349 |