Casio EX-Z90 vs Olympus TG-320
96 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Casio EX-Z90 vs Olympus TG-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-105mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 121g - 90 x 52 x 19mm
- Launched August 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Released January 2012
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-Z90 vs Olympus TG-320 Overview
Lets look a little more in depth at the Casio EX-Z90 versus Olympus TG-320, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by rivals Casio and Olympus. The image resolution of the EX-Z90 (12MP) and the TG-320 (14MP) is very comparable and both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe EX-Z90 was released 3 years before the TG-320 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief overview of how the EX-Z90 scores versus the TG-320 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-Z90 vs Olympus TG-320 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-Z90 & Olympus TG-320. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z90 Gallery & Olympus TG-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z90 over the Olympus TG-320
| EX-Z90 | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Casio EX-Z90
| TG-320 | EX-Z90 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2012 |  | August 2009 | Fresher by 29 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z90 and Olympus TG-320
| EX-Z90 | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Equal display sizing |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Equal display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lack of Touch display |
Casio EX-Z90 vs Olympus TG-320 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry your camera regularly, you should think about its weight and size. The Casio EX-Z90 has exterior dimensions of 90mm x 52mm x 19mm (3.5" x 2.0" x 0.7") having a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-320 has specifications of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") along with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-Z90 versus Olympus TG-320 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the EX-Z90 versus the TG-320.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z90 and TG-320 is 96 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-Z90 vs Olympus TG-320 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor sizing only by going through technical specs. The photograph here will give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z90 and TG-320.
As you have seen, both the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You can expect to see the Olympus TG-320 to produce more detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop photos a bit more aggressively. The older EX-Z90 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-Z90 vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio EX-Z90 vs Olympus TG-320 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z90 | Olympus TG-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z90 | Olympus TG-320 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2009-08-18 | 2012-01-10 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Digic 4 | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/3.5-5.1 |
| Macro focus distance | 10cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m | 5.80 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 121 gr (0.27 lb) | 155 gr (0.34 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 90 x 52 x 19mm (3.5" x 2.0" x 0.7") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 150 shots |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-60 | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $150 | $0 |