Casio EX-Z90 vs Samsung GX-1S
96 Imaging
34 Features
17 Overall
27


68 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
Casio EX-Z90 vs Samsung GX-1S Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-105mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 121g - 90 x 52 x 19mm
- Announced August 2009
(Full Review)
- 6MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- No Video
- Pentax KAF Mount
- 605g - 125 x 93 x 66mm
- Introduced January 2006

Casio EX-Z90 vs Samsung GX-1S Overview
Following is a in-depth review of the Casio EX-Z90 vs Samsung GX-1S, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by companies Casio and Samsung. There exists a considerable gap between the image resolutions of the EX-Z90 (12MP) and GX-1S (6MP) and the EX-Z90 (1/2.3") and GX-1S (APS-C) have totally different sensor size.

The EX-Z90 was brought out 3 years after the GX-1S which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z90 being a Compact camera and the Samsung GX-1S being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before going into a full comparison, here is a concise view of how the EX-Z90 grades against the GX-1S when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Casio EX-Z90 vs Samsung GX-1S Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-Z90 & Samsung GX-1S. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-Z90 Gallery & Samsung GX-1S Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z90 over the Samsung GX-1S
EX-Z90 | GX-1S | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2009 | ![]() | January 2006 | More modern by 44 months |
Screen dimensions | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 210k | Sharper screen (+20k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-1S over the Casio EX-Z90
GX-1S | EX-Z90 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-Z90 and Samsung GX-1S
EX-Z90 | GX-1S | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-Z90 vs Samsung GX-1S Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry around your camera regularly, you have to consider its weight and size. The Casio EX-Z90 has got external measurements of 90mm x 52mm x 19mm (3.5" x 2.0" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Samsung GX-1S has specifications of 125mm x 93mm x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") with a weight of 605 grams (1.33 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-Z90 vs Samsung GX-1S in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. Below is a front view size comparison of the EX-Z90 compared to the GX-1S.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z90 and GX-1S is 96 and 68 respectively.

Casio EX-Z90 vs Samsung GX-1S Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's hard to envision the difference between sensor sizes merely by reviewing specs. The image underneath should provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z90 and GX-1S.
All in all, the two cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The EX-Z90 due to its tinier sensor will make getting shallow DOF harder and the Casio EX-Z90 will offer extra detail having its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The younger EX-Z90 is going to have an advantage in sensor tech.

Casio EX-Z90 vs Samsung GX-1S Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-Z90 vs Samsung GX-1S Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z90 | Samsung GX-1S | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Samsung |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z90 | Samsung GX-1S |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced DSLR |
Announced | 2009-08-18 | 2006-01-16 |
Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Digic 4 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 6MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3008 x 2008 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 200 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Pentax KAF |
Lens zoom range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | - |
Macro focusing range | 10cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 151 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | 2.5" |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 210 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | - |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 121g (0.27 lb) | 605g (1.33 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 90 x 52 x 19mm (3.5" x 2.0" x 0.7") | 125 x 93 x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-60 | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal | SD/MMC card |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $150 | $850 |