Casio EX-Z90 vs Samsung NX300
96 Imaging
34 Features
17 Overall
27
86 Imaging
61 Features
73 Overall
65
Casio EX-Z90 vs Samsung NX300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-105mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 121g - 90 x 52 x 19mm
- Launched August 2009
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 331g - 122 x 64 x 41mm
- Released November 2013
- Superseded the Samsung NX210
- New Model is Samsung NX500
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-Z90 vs Samsung NX300 Overview
Here, we will be reviewing the Casio EX-Z90 versus Samsung NX300, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Casio and Samsung. There exists a substantial gap among the image resolutions of the EX-Z90 (12MP) and NX300 (20MP) and the EX-Z90 (1/2.3") and NX300 (APS-C) boast different sensor sizes.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-Z90 was released 5 years before the NX300 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-Z90 being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX300 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going into a full comparison, here is a quick summary of how the EX-Z90 matches up versus the NX300 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-Z90 vs Samsung NX300 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-Z90 & Samsung NX300. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z90 Gallery & Samsung NX300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z90 over the Samsung NX300
| EX-Z90 | NX300 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung NX300 over the Casio EX-Z90
| NX300 | EX-Z90 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | November 2013 | August 2009 | Newer by 51 months | |
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen size | 3.3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.6") | |
| Screen resolution | 768k | 230k | Clearer screen (+538k dot) | |
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z90 and Samsung NX300
| EX-Z90 | NX300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Casio EX-Z90 vs Samsung NX300 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to travel with your camera frequently, you need to factor its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z90 comes with outside measurements of 90mm x 52mm x 19mm (3.5" x 2.0" x 0.7") and a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Samsung NX300 has sizing of 122mm x 64mm x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") accompanied by a weight of 331 grams (0.73 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-Z90 versus Samsung NX300 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are using at the time. Here is a front view sizing comparison of the EX-Z90 compared to the NX300.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z90 and NX300 is 96 and 86 respectively.
Casio EX-Z90 vs Samsung NX300 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be difficult to imagine the difference in sensor dimensions only by going through a spec sheet. The image here will give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z90 and NX300.
Clearly, each of these cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The EX-Z90 due to its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field trickier and the Samsung NX300 will provide more detail as a result of its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs way more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z90 will be behind in sensor technology.
Casio EX-Z90 vs Samsung NX300 Screen and ViewFinder
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio EX-Z90 vs Samsung NX300 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z90 | Samsung NX300 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z90 | Samsung NX300 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Launched | 2009-08-18 | 2013-11-24 |
| Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Digic 4 | DRIMe IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 20MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 5472 x 3648 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 247 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
| Lens focal range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | - |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 10cm | - |
| Available lenses | - | 32 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen size | 2.7" | 3.3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 768 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | - | Active Matrix OLED screen |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/6000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 9.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | - | 1/180s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080, 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Optional |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 121g (0.27 lb) | 331g (0.73 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 90 x 52 x 19mm (3.5" x 2.0" x 0.7") | 122 x 64 x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 76 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.6 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.7 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 942 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 330 images |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-60 | BP1130 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $150 | $750 |