Casio EX-Z90 vs Samsung SL102
96 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Casio EX-Z90 vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-105mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 121g - 90 x 52 x 19mm
- Announced August 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Announced January 2009
- Other Name is ES55
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-Z90 vs Samsung SL102 Overview
In this write-up, we are analyzing the Casio EX-Z90 vs Samsung SL102, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-Z90 (12MP) and the SL102 (10MP) is fairly well matched and they come with the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-Z90 was announced 8 months later than the SL102 which means that they are both of a similar age. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving in to a in depth comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the EX-Z90 scores against the SL102 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-Z90 vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-Z90 & Samsung SL102. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z90 Gallery & Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z90 over the Samsung SL102
| EX-Z90 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | August 2009 |  | January 2009 | Fresher by 8 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Display sizing | 2.7" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Casio EX-Z90
| SL102 | EX-Z90 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-Z90 and Samsung SL102
| EX-Z90 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Identical display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither offers Touch display |
Casio EX-Z90 vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry your camera, you'll have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-Z90 offers outside dimensions of 90mm x 52mm x 19mm (3.5" x 2.0" x 0.7") having a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs) while the Samsung SL102 has dimensions of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-Z90 vs Samsung SL102 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you use during that time. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the EX-Z90 and the SL102.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z90 and SL102 is 96 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-Z90 vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is difficult to picture the contrast between sensor sizing just by looking at specifications. The graphic below should give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z90 and SL102.
To sum up, both of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different megapixels. You can anticipate the Casio EX-Z90 to give you extra detail with its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images far more aggressively. The newer EX-Z90 should have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-Z90 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio EX-Z90 vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z90 | Samsung SL102 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z90 | Samsung SL102 |
| Also called | - | ES55 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2009-08-18 | 2009-01-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Digic 4 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 10cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inch | 2.5 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 121 grams (0.27 pounds) | 116 grams (0.26 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 90 x 52 x 19mm (3.5" x 2.0" x 0.7") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-60 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $150 | $130 |