Casio EX-Z90 vs Samsung WB210
96 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
94 Imaging
37 Features
45 Overall
40
Casio EX-Z90 vs Samsung WB210 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-105mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 121g - 90 x 52 x 19mm
- Released August 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Expand to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F2.9-5.9) lens
- 174g - 101 x 59 x 22mm
- Revealed July 2011
Photography Glossary Casio EX-Z90 vs Samsung WB210 Overview
Below, we are looking at the Casio EX-Z90 versus Samsung WB210, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-Z90 (12MP) and the WB210 (14MP) is fairly close and they feature the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-Z90 was unveiled 23 months earlier than the WB210 making the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a more detailed comparison, below is a short overview of how the EX-Z90 scores against the WB210 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-Z90 vs Samsung WB210 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-Z90 & Samsung WB210. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z90 Gallery & Samsung WB210 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z90 over the Samsung WB210
| EX-Z90 | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 1k | Sharper display (+229k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB210 over the Casio EX-Z90
| WB210 | EX-Z90 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | July 2011 |  | August 2009 | More recent by 23 months |
| Display dimension | 3.5" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.8") |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z90 and Samsung WB210
| EX-Z90 | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen |
Casio EX-Z90 vs Samsung WB210 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to lug around your camera frequently, you will need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-Z90 enjoys physical measurements of 90mm x 52mm x 19mm (3.5" x 2.0" x 0.7") with a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB210 has measurements of 101mm x 59mm x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 174 grams (0.38 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-Z90 versus Samsung WB210 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have at the time. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the EX-Z90 compared to the WB210.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z90 and WB210 is 96 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-Z90 vs Samsung WB210 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is tough to visualise the gap in sensor measurements merely by researching a spec sheet. The graphic underneath should give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z90 and WB210.
Clearly, each of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Samsung WB210 to result in extra detail having an extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop images much more aggressively. The older EX-Z90 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-Z90 vs Samsung WB210 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-Z90 vs Samsung WB210 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z90 | Samsung WB210 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z90 | Samsung WB210 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2009-08-18 | 2011-07-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Digic 4 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Max boosted ISO | - | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/2.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 10cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3.5" |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 1k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 121 gr (0.27 lbs) | 174 gr (0.38 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 90 x 52 x 19mm (3.5" x 2.0" x 0.7") | 101 x 59 x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-60 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal | microSC/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $150 | $279 |