Casio EX-Z90 vs Samsung WB250F
96 Imaging
34 Features
17 Overall
27
93 Imaging
37 Features
44 Overall
39
Casio EX-Z90 vs Samsung WB250F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-105mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 121g - 90 x 52 x 19mm
- Launched August 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 226g - 106 x 62 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2013
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-Z90 vs Samsung WB250F Overview
Below is a extended overview of the Casio EX-Z90 versus Samsung WB250F, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-Z90 (12MP) and the WB250F (14MP) is very comparable and they possess the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-Z90 was revealed 4 years before the WB250F and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving through a in depth comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the EX-Z90 grades vs the WB250F with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-Z90 vs Samsung WB250F Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-Z90 and Samsung WB250F. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z90 Gallery and Samsung WB250F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z90 over the Samsung WB250F
| EX-Z90 | WB250F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial precise focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB250F over the Casio EX-Z90
| WB250F | EX-Z90 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2013 |  | August 2009 | More recent by 41 months |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z90 and Samsung WB250F
| EX-Z90 | WB250F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen |
Casio EX-Z90 vs Samsung WB250F Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to lug around your camera, you will want to consider its weight and size. The Casio EX-Z90 has got outside measurements of 90mm x 52mm x 19mm (3.5" x 2.0" x 0.7") and a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs) while the Samsung WB250F has specifications of 106mm x 62mm x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-Z90 versus Samsung WB250F in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you select at that moment. Underneath is the front view size comparison of the EX-Z90 and the WB250F.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z90 and WB250F is 96 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-Z90 vs Samsung WB250F Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very tough to envision the contrast in sensor measurements just by seeing specs. The graphic below should offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z90 and WB250F.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same megapixels. You should expect to see the Samsung WB250F to show more detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images much more aggressively. The older EX-Z90 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-Z90 vs Samsung WB250F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-Z90 vs Samsung WB250F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z90 | Samsung WB250F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z90 | Samsung WB250F |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2009-08-18 | 2013-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Digic 4 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | 10cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 16s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 8.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 121g (0.27 lbs) | 226g (0.50 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 90 x 52 x 19mm (3.5" x 2.0" x 0.7") | 106 x 62 x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-60 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $150 | $250 |