Casio EX-ZR10 vs Fujifilm F900EXR
93 Imaging
35 Features
35 Overall
35


90 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Fujifilm F900EXR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 69 x 27mm
- Introduced September 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Increase to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 232g - 105 x 61 x 36mm
- Launched January 2013
- Replaced the Fujifilm F800EXR

Casio EX-ZR10 vs Fujifilm F900EXR Overview
In this write-up, we are contrasting the Casio EX-ZR10 vs Fujifilm F900EXR, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Casio and FujiFilm. There exists a big gap between the resolutions of the EX-ZR10 (12MP) and Fujifilm F900EXR (16MP) and the EX-ZR10 (1/2.3") and Fujifilm F900EXR (1/2") enjoy totally different sensor size.

The EX-ZR10 was unveiled 3 years prior to the Fujifilm F900EXR and that is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a thorough comparison, below is a short summation of how the EX-ZR10 matches up vs the Fujifilm F900EXR when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Casio EX-ZR10 vs Fujifilm F900EXR Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 and Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR10 Gallery and Fujifilm F900EXR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR10 over the Fujifilm F900EXR
EX-ZR10 | Fujifilm F900EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More exact focus |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F900EXR over the Casio EX-ZR10
Fujifilm F900EXR | EX-ZR10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2013 | ![]() | September 2010 | Fresher by 28 months |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 461k | Crisper display (+459k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR10 and Fujifilm F900EXR
EX-ZR10 | Fujifilm F900EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Fujifilm F900EXR Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry your camera regularly, you will want to think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR10 provides external measurements of 102mm x 69mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") along with a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Fujifilm F900EXR has sizing of 105mm x 61mm x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") and a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-ZR10 vs Fujifilm F900EXR in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you use at the time. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the EX-ZR10 compared to the Fujifilm F900EXR.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR10 and Fujifilm F900EXR is 93 and 90 respectively.

Casio EX-ZR10 vs Fujifilm F900EXR Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be tough to see the difference between sensor sizing just by going over a spec sheet. The photograph underneath will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR10 and Fujifilm F900EXR.
As you can see, the two cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The EX-ZR10 using its tinier sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field trickier and the Fujifilm F900EXR will offer you greater detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images a little more aggressively. The older EX-ZR10 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.

Casio EX-ZR10 vs Fujifilm F900EXR Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-ZR10 vs Fujifilm F900EXR Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 | Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | FujiFilm |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 | Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2010-09-20 | 2013-01-30 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Exilim Engine HS | EXR II |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | EXRCMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.4 x 4.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 30.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 25-500mm (20.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-5.3 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.6 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 461 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT color LCD monitor |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 11.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 3.70 m (Wide: 15 cm–3.7 m / Tele: 90 cm–2.4m) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 176 grams (0.39 lb) | 232 grams (0.51 lb) |
Dimensions | 102 x 69 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 105 x 61 x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 260 photographs |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-110 | NP-50A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat)) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $190 | $380 |